Utopianism has existed in one form or another as long as recorded history. Humans have had visions of the great ‘utopia’ – the great Divine Kingdom – being established over the entire world and putting and end to all humanities ill’s, for thousands of years.
The Buddhists have talked of ‘Shambhala’, a mythical hidden kingdom, where perfect peace and tranquillity reigns. It is supposed to be ruled by a king called ‘Rigden Takpa’, and according to the Kalachakra Tantra, when the world is ruled by greed and war, the 25th king of Shambhala will rise up and conquer the ‘Dark Forces’ and thus usher in a new global Golden Age.
In the Book of Revelations in the Bible, horrendous world-wide tribulations and depopulation are meted out against the people of the world by God, and the survivors of these tribulations go on to witness the Second Coming of Christ and the utopian Kingdom of God established over the planet. According to the Book of Revelation: ‘God shall wipe away all tears from their [the survivors’] eyes: and there shall be no more Death. Neither sorrow, nor crying. Neither shall there be any more pain, for the former things are passed away’.
In the Catholic tradition, the Kingdom of God must be manifest by Christians in the period between the Resurrection of Christ, and the Second Coming of Christ – which is when the Kingdom of God is supposed to achieve perfection. In his book ‘Jesus of Nazareth’, Pope Benedict XVI says there are three dimensions to the Kingdom of God – 1. Jesus Christ himself is the Kingdom of God, 2. The Kingdom of God is within man, and 3. The Catholic Church is basically the Kingdom of God.
This is one of the main goals of the Vatican secret societies, such as the Jesuit Order and the Knights of Malta – the assisting in establishing and preparing the Earth for the coming Kingdom of God – the Christian Utopia.
The phrase ‘Utopia’ was coined by Thomas More in his book of the same name, which was published in 1516. The book is about a fictional island where a kind of ‘perfect society’ is resident. The word ‘Utopia’ is derived from two Greek words: ‘Ou’ – ‘Not’, and ‘Topos’ – ‘place’. Literally - ‘No-place-land’. Or I suppose you could say ‘no-such-place’…
A Woodcut of More’s ‘Utopia’
A more modern vision of a global Utopia is the novel ‘Brave New World’ by Aldous Huxley. In the novel, a scientific World State (or World Government) rules the peoples of the planet, and is what Huxley called a ‘benevolent dictatorship’, in that it uses methods of domestication and conditioning to get the people to enjoy their servitude. The idea is that this World State can last indefinitely, since the people of the world are made to enjoy being ruled by their ‘scientific dictatorship’ through subtle forms of mind control. In Huxley’s vision, the people’s tears are wiped away by the ‘Kingdom of God’ in the form of a World Dictatorship.
The first stirrings of an agenda for a utopian ‘scientific dictatorship’ were manifest in a secret society founded in 1776 called the Order of the Bavarian Illuminati.
The Jesuit-trained Adam Weishaupt founded the society with the aim of establishing a World Government run by a small minority of intellectuals called ‘The Illuminati’. These intellectuals would eradicate the world’s religions and govern the world with a new religion of ‘science’ and ‘rationalism’, they said, and they adopted the symbol of the all-seeing-eye in the capstone of a pyramid as their emblem.
The symbol adopted by the Bavarian Illuminati. The shining eye represents the Illuminati Elite, while the pyramid represents the masses beneath them.
The ‘inner-core’ members of this Illuminati Secret Society were five people by the names of Meyer Amschel Rothschild, Franz Kolmer, Alphonse Donatien de Sade, Sir Francis Dashwood, and of course the founder Adam Weishaupt. According to documents retrieved from the body of a courier for the Bavarian Illuminati in 1785, they planned to use blackmail, bribery, and indoctrination to take over governments and other secret societies like the Freemasons.
According to official history, the Illuminati conspiracy never came to fruition, but authors such as John Robinson (professor of natural philosophy at Edinburgh University in 1798) have claimed that actually they did indeed secretly take over Freemasonry and governments as they had planned, and in fact were largely behind the French Revolution.
The founder of the Bavarian Illuminati – the Jesuit-trained Adam Weishaupt
Whatever the case, revolutionary movements that championed a New World Order of rationalism and the principles of the Enlightenment swept through secret societies like the Freemasons around this time, and led to historical events like the American Revolution.
These revolutionary movements also contributed largely to the philosophies of Karl Marx and the rise of Communism. According to the philosophy of Communism, a modern Utopia can be achieved for the ‘working classes’ if they rise up in a violent and bloody revolution against their capitalist ‘oppressors’. Communism champions the ‘Dawn of a New Day’ – the ‘scientific’ abolishment of all religion, the family, and private-property; all property and wealth is ‘shared’ by all members of society. Of course, as we can see from Soviet Russia and Communist China, Communism is actually all about totalitarianism, dictatorship, and horrific mass-murder and domination, and leads to something more akin to a ‘dystopia’ than a ‘utopia’.
We could say that Communist Russia was a ‘scientific’ dictatorship – it certainly was a dictatorship, and did claim to be scientific, but really was not. So what about nowadays? Do scientific dictatorships still pose a threat?
The intellectual and author Bertrand Russell (who was privy to discussions and debates most people are not) wrote in his 1953 book ‘The Impact of Science on Society’ that Scientific Dictatorships could indeed rise in the future. He said such a dictatorship could only survive if it was world-wide. Were his predictions accurate?
The most powerful people in the world, the world-wide ‘Superclass’, or the ‘Global Elite’ as I will call them, generally have no care in the world for civil liberties, or for national sovereignty. In fact, it would appear that the goals of the Bavarian Illuminati are fast becoming a reality – the Global Elite are adamant on picking away at both until an authoritarian World Government is formed.
According to the mainstream British newspapers, the British Government regularly snoops and spies on the internet activity of much of the British population. The Daily Mail claimed in 2009 that £380 a minute is spent by the government on spying-on and observing the internet activity of the British people.
A study conducted by an American internet-security company on electronic police-state measures concluded that the UK has the 6th most draconian measures in the world, and the United States has the 5th worst! Communist China came in at 2nd, which really says something about the Big-Brother-society of the UK and the US.
In 2009, it was revealed that eight/nine years previously, Jack Straw and then-Prime-Minister Tony Blair had made secret agreements to open Britain’s borders to floods of immigrants from foreign countries. According to Andrew Neather, who had worked under then-Home-Secretary Jack Straw, the Labour Party had indeed opened the borders wide to floods of immigrants, all mostly for political reasons, including attempting to simply shame opposing parties. He said that a government report entitled ‘Research, Development and Statistics Occasional Paper No67 - Migration: An Economic And Social Analysis’ suggested allowing waves of immigration into Britain for various ‘beneficial’ reasons, and the government had gone ahead with such a plan, since it would allow them to get one-up on the ‘opposing’ parties.
The continued policy of ‘Multiculturalism’ on mass immigration between the EU-countries is actually leading to Uni-culturalism – all countries have the same general mix of peoples from many different countries. Instead of having diversity of people between, say, France, Britain, Italy, etc, the same basic mix of a multi-ethnic people is emerging, so in the end all countries have the same population and lack of national identity and national uniqueness. In a twist straight from the pages of George Orwell’s dystopian novel ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’, any disagreement or argument against the mass immigration policies is usually dismissed by politicians as ‘politically incorrect’ or ‘racist’. In fact, in many cases, ‘Political Correctness’ may as well be called ‘Newspeak’, as Orwell dubbed it.
In place of individual countries, a big EU-wide super-state is emerging, with all EU countries dominated by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels.
The Global Elite generally believe that government is a brilliant thing, and a Government of the World would be an even better thing. As quoted in the document ‘Common Cause: A Monthly Report of the Committee to Frame a World Constitution Vol. I, No.2 (Aug 1947)’: ‘Government is the thing. Law is the thing. Not brotherhood, not international cooperation, not security councils that can stop war only by waging it...Where does security lie, anyway — security against the thief, a bad man, the murderer? In brotherly love? Not at all. It lies in government.’
And a World Government would be even better, from their perspective.
So you see, we are descending into a world akin to the Utopian/Dystopian visions throughout the ages, and it is certainly becoming the ‘scientific dictatorship’ foretold in ‘Brave New World’ and ‘The Impact of Science on Society’.
But I doubt even Aldous Huxley or George Orwell could have dreamt up the kind of technology that is being developed today.
1. The Underground Bases
At the helm of the drive towards a totalitarian World Government are the global corporations and the US government. The alliance between the big-business corporations and the US government’s military has become known as the ‘Military-Industrial Complex’ and has received a large amount of criticism by American patriots and activists around the world because big business + military = serious money made from warfare. Wars then become a celebration for sociopathic corporations and heads of the military because both gain from warfare.
This would explain the obsession with global warfare and ‘American’ dominance in the world, since wars with countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, and now possibly even Iran, become a success story for the Military-Industrial Complex.
This Military-Industrial Complex has a world-wide network of military bases all over the planet, many even underground and undersea, and some installations even in space. This amounts to something akin to a world empire, and ensures that the sociopathic profit-generating machine of global warfare and corporate corruption maintains its grip on the world.
As to the exact whereabouts of much of these bases, we can only speculate. But they are certainly extensive.
The Cheyenne Mountain Complex in Colorado is one such underground base, and there are certainly some kind of underground facilities beneath the Denver International Airport.
As if sporting monolithic statues of a blue zombie Mustang and the Egyptian god of Death, Anubis (as well as a large gargoyle statue in the baggage-pickup) aren’t creepy enough, there clearly is something strange going on beneath Denver Airport. The construction of the airport was unusually time-consuming and extremely expensive, and there were a number of construction companies involved in the construction of the airport that were fired and switched around in a seemingly bizarre fashion. There have also been reports of frequencies emanating from beneath the airport which make some people sick and cause headaches in others. Reportedly, there are more than 19 miles of conveyor belt track, luggage transport cars, and road, all in their own underground tunnels that move ‘baggage and goods’ beneath the airport.
Is all this supposed to welcome passengers to Denver or something?
It is one hell of a bizarre place, and the underground tunnels beneath the airport may very well connect to the Cheyenne Mountain Complex I mentioned earlier.
The federal agency known as the Department for Housing and Development (HUD) was found to have ‘lost’ around $59,000,000,000 (that’s 59 billion) according to an audit done around the year 2000. According to USATODAY, in 2004 ‘NASA failed to account for billions of dollars spent on the space shuttle and International Space Station, according to a report’. There are many other examples of hugely excessive spending and ‘missing money’ by government agencies such as the Pentagon, so naturally, we should be asking, ‘where the hell is the money going?’
They have plenty of money at their disposal for the black budget, and for constructing elaborate underground, over-ground, and even under-water facilities.
A video of images and photos of the kind of underground facilities the Global Elite have
So as you can see, they have extensive underground and over-ground facilities for scientific research and experimentation.
2. Cyborg Spy-Bugs??
Just the kinds of technology and experiments that they publicly admit they are working on, or have already developed, are bizarre enough.
According to New Scientist, researchers in the United States have found that rats can be remote-controlled through electronic brain-implants, and the research has been funded by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) for use in warzones. They could be used to sniff out targets and find objects by the military, but it seems that the research into remote control rats has been replaced by research into remote-control insects.
In fact, insects, rats, pigeons, and even sharks have been the subject of experiments into remote-controlled creatures, according to New Scientist. The idea behind the remote-control insects is that they could act as the perfect spies, if wired with a microscopic microphone. New Scientist writer Jessica Marshall wrote:
‘The next time a moth alights on your window sill, watch what you say. Sure, it may look like an innocent visitor, irresistibly drawn to the light in your room, but it could actually be a spy - one of a new generation of cyborg insects with implants wired into their nerves to allow remote control of their movement. Be warned, flesh-and-blood bugs may soon live up to their name.’
You thought I was joking…?
The insects are implanted with an electronic microchip early in their development, intertwining their nerves and muscles with circuitry so that they can then be steered and controlled from a computer.
Exactly where this leaves personal privacy is anyone’s guess.
3. Spy Drones and Tazer-Bots
The British police are preparing to unleash an armada of robot drones and aircraft for the next generation of British ‘crime-fighting’. Of course, using robots and drones designed for use in a warzone on the British people en masse is something that sounds more like the moves of a high-tech dictatorship than a ‘free-country’, but then that’s what it’s all about.
If you thought that the current network of CCTV cameras throughout the UK tracking and tracing the moves of every British person was bad enough, then this will make your eyes water. Earlier this year, the British police announced that they are planning on deploying a vast swarm of surveillance drones, formerly deployed in Afghanistan, to, according to the Guardian, watch the every move of ‘antisocial motorists, ¬protesters, agricultural thieves and fly-tippers, in a significant expansion of covert state surveillance.’
The drones are intended to fly around so far up in the sky that they are imperceptible to anyone on the ground, and are being prepared for use during the 2012 London Olympics. Some police officers have reportedly said that the information from the drones will be supplied to private companies, and Kent Police’s own documents show that they phased in the use of the drones covertly to avoid any public backlash.
Some of the robot drones intended to be deployed are for more than mere surveillance, however. Some are intended to be loaded with ‘non-lethal’ weapons – that is, they will be armed with tazers, flash-ball weapons, LRAD sound cannons, and blinding flash-lights to physically attack the population.
Tazer stun-guns are to be mounted on the back of the smaller drones, ready to zap anyone who doesn’t bow down to the authoritarian government. According to a report from Wired News, ‘Antoine di Zazzo, head of SMP Technologies, which distributes tazers in France, says the company is fitting one to a small quad-rotor iDrone (another quad-rotor toy helicopter), which some have called a “flying saucer”’. Since June 2001, at least 351 people have died from Tazer-use by police in America, and so they certainly are serious torture weaponry.
‘French company Tecknisolar Seni has demonstrated a portable drone armed with a double-barrelled 44mm Flash-Ball gun’ reports Wired News. The flash-ball guns, used by French special police, launch tear gas and rubber pellets, ‘the same effect as the punch of a champion boxer,’ claim makers Verney-Carron.
Some of the drones are intended to be mounted with LRAD sound cannons, to shout commands at citizens and even blast them away with deafening tones.
The Wired News report also suggests that some drones be fitted with blinding lights to disable and capture renegade citizens. ‘High-intensity strobes can cause dizziness, disorientation and loss of balance making it virtually impossible to run away’ the report says.
It might not look very imposing, but I’m sure if it hit you a few times with its Tazer cannon you’d learn to love Big Brother, too…
In the United States, autonomous ground robots armed with Tazers have been developed for use by the police and the Pentagon. The company ‘iRobot’ announced they had developed such robots in 2007, which are operated by remote-control by police officers or army personnel from a computer. iRobot calls their creation ‘the first robot of its kind with an on-board, integrated tazer payload’ according to Associated Press. In fact, the Wisconsin Police Department have already been working with students from Milwaukee School of Engineering in creating a wireless robot, armed with a tazer and video capabilities, as far back as 2006.
A video promo for the T-RAD Tazer robot, begins at 4.09
4. Robotics
The sophistication of robotics developed publicly already is quite beyond what a lot of people might have normally thought.
In Kudan Elementary School in Tokyo, Japan, a robot teacher named Saya was given it’s first test-drive in teaching a full class of young children, with plans to expand the use of such robot teachers underway, according to the Telegraph.
Robo-teach Saya
DARPA have already backed researchers who successfully developed a tiny, humming-bird like robot which can fly for periods of up to 20 seconds at a time. The idea is to develop tiny robot spies to operate inside buildings, and be controllable from up to a kilometre away. The company that made the tiny remote-controlled flying robot, AeroVironment, have plans to turn the machine into something more closely resembling the real thing.
AeroVironment’s intended robot hummingbird
The Pentagon put out a request to contractors in 2008 to develop teams of robots that can search for, detect and track ‘non-cooperative’ humans in ‘pursuit/evasion scenarios’. The request was published on the Department of Defense Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program website, and calls for a ‘Multi-Robot Pursuit System’ to be operated by one person.
The proposal describes the need to:
‘...develop a software/hardware suit that would enable a multi-robot team, together with a human operator, to search for and detect a non-cooperative human subject.
The main research task will involve determining the movements of the robot team through the environment to maximize the opportunity to find the subject, while minimizing the chances of missing the subject. If the operator is an active member of the search team, the software should minimize the chance that the operator may encounter the subject.’
It is seemingly important to the Pentagon that the operator should not have to come into contact with the person being chased down by the machines.
‘The software should maintain awareness of line-of-sight, as well as communication and sensor limits.’ It says. ‘It will be necessary to determine an appropriate sensor suite that can reliably detect human presence and is suitable for implementation on small robotic platforms.’
Steve Wright, an expert on police and military technologies, from Leeds Metropolitan University, told New Scientist reporter Paul Marks:
‘What we have here are the beginnings of something designed to enable robots to hunt down humans like a pack of dogs. Once the software is perfected we can reasonably anticipate that they will become autonomous and become armed.
We can also expect such systems to be equipped with human detection and tracking devices including sensors which detect human breath and the radio waves associated with a human heart beat. These are technologies already developed.’
AI and Robotics engineer from the University of Sheffield, Noel Sharky, also reportedly said:
‘This is a clear step towards one of the main goals of the US Army's Future Combat Systems project, which aims to make a single soldier the nexus for a large scale robot attack. Independently, ground and aerial robots have been tested together and once the bits are joined, there will be a robot force under command of a single soldier with potentially dire consequences for innocents around the corner.’
Are Boston Dynamics’ Big Dog robots the hopefuls for the task of chasing down ‘non-cooperative’ packs of humans?
A 7-page report from Popular Science explains that the US military and DARPA publicly have created large robotized vehicles that can navigate their way through rough terrain, as well as remote-controlled vehicles for various purposes. The Army has already tested a 100-pound remote-control tread robot that can be equipped with any one of four weapons ranging from an M16 rifle to a medium-weight machine gun, although it hasn't yet decided to use it for combat. ‘The operator sees a bore-sighted image with a crosshairs,’ said Bob Quinn, construction company Foster-Miller's general manager for Talon operations. ‘It's exactly like a videogame – except its real.’
Killer robots in the battle field are not something expected to arise in the near-future, but Director of Global-Security.org John Pike believes it’s still an issue. ‘They’re going to sneak up on us, just like UAVs did’, he said.
According to the Popular Science report:
‘At DARPA, Larry Jackel, who manages three of the agency's ground-robotics programs, is spearheading a project to program [Unmanned Ground Vehicles] with behavioral cues that will allow them to respond appropriately to unexpected situations and learn from experience. “We believe the problem is too complex to write an algorithm to traverse every piece of topography,” Jackel says. “A robot's got to be like a child, who learns to crawl, then walk, and then run.”’
DARPA’s Self Explanation Learning Framework (SELF) program begun in 2009, headed by Dr Mike Cox, aims to develop, basically, self-aware AI that can analyses its own successes and failures and is able to reason about them. The aim is to ‘advance scientific understanding of meta-reasoning and self-explanation [and] exploit this advancement by building systems that can reason about their own successes and failures and can explain this reasoning to others’. Basically, some kind of software program or computer that can diagnose and reason about it’s own mistakes, thus helping to ‘participate in it’s own construction’, and bringing us a huge step further to true Artificial Intelligence.
Will the robot tanks of the future be run by such highly-advanced AI?
Behold, Israel’s new snake-bot…
The Israeli military have developed what may be the perfect Unmanned-Ground-Vehicle (UGV) robot spy – a remote-controlled robo-snake. It is armed with a microphone and a camera, and suggestions have even been made that it could be a ‘suicide snake’ – it could literally blow itself up upon spotting an enemy target.
Yep, the Global Elite are seriously entering into some ‘twilight-zone’ territory with their military operations.
5. AI-Controlled Cars
Only 5 years ago, computer scientists and engineers were predicting that we would have self-driving cars developed in about half a century. The head of Stanford University's Artificial Intelligence Lab, computer scientist Sebastian Thrun, told NOVA producers: ‘It’s a no-brainer for me that at some point our cars will have the ability to drive themselves…Just think 50 years ahead. There's no question that 50 years from now we'll have the technology for cars to drive themselves.’
Well, Thrun’s predictions might have been a little too far ahead. The Telegraph reported earlier this year that tests for unmanned cars will begin next year, in hope of developing them within the next decade. An EU project called ‘Sartre’ is developing a system co-ordinated by a navigation system and transmitter/receiver unit installed in each car that allows a multiple number of cars to simply follow automatically behind a lead vehicle, with drivers of the following cars needing to do nothing. The effect is called a ‘carpool’ and is predicted to be in use within 10 years time.
Engineering website ‘Engineer’s Edge’ reported last year that an EU-funded project, called ‘CyberCars2’, has now demonstrated that vehicles can be left to themselves much more, in fact even communicating with each other. If allowed to 'talk' to each other, automated vehicles can organise themselves well enough to get around efficiently all on their own. The intention is to have co-ordinated self-driving cars that organise themselves rank-and-file across the road, says Engineer’s Edge.
General Motors executives also agree that self-driving cars, implanted with a computer chip and antenna allowing them to be remote-controlled, will be in usage by the public within 10 years time. Many adherents of the technology see the wonderful benefits it could bring – as in far less road accidents. But couldn’t money be better spent on public education on driving and road safety, rather than expansive car-control systems?
IBM have filed patents for technology that allows governments to shut down cars via traffic signals and other transportation signals. As this website described it, ‘it’s like Skynet… only much worse’.
Considering that this is the corporation that provided the biometrics technology for the Nazis, we need to ask, ‘are their intentions really to benefit mankind?’
I can understand the appeal to the more ‘military-minded’ – if ‘enemy’ targets are being driven down a quiet road to their intended destination, how hard would it be to perform a Boston-Brakes assassination and cover it up?
Is a worst-case scenario here similar to what is portrayed in the film ‘IRobot’, where Will Smith’s car is high-jacked and crashed by malevolent AI?
Well, one things for certain, if the Global Elite have their way with the world, even your car won’t belong to you.
6. Genetic-Mutant Hybrid-Animals
In 2002, the Canadian company Nexia unveiled two goats, called Webster and Peter. Only these were not the average goats – they were ‘spider-goats’.
They had been genetically tampered with – their own genome was mixed with spider genes to create goats whose milk contains ingredients of spider-silk. The idea was to create something called ‘Bio-Steel’ from the spider-silk, which is of course an incredibly strong, powerful material. The ‘Bio-steel’ is intended for use in artificial tendons, medical sutures, soft body armour and a host of other applications.
Not only have animal-animal hybrids been created, animal-human hybrids have also been created. According to National Geographic:
‘Chinese scientists at the Shanghai Second Medical University in 2003 successfully fused human cells with rabbit eggs. The embryos were reportedly the first human-animal chimeras successfully created. They were allowed to develop for several days in a laboratory dish before the scientists destroyed the embryos to harvest their stem cells.
In Minnesota last year researchers at the Mayo Clinic created pigs with human blood flowing through their bodies.
And at Stanford University in California an experiment might be done later this year to create mice with human brains.’
These creatures were created for research purposes, since scientists believe that with human genetics, such animals will provide more accurate research models.
Experiments mixing animals and human genetics have not been so much of a problem to much of the public; the real controversy has been sparked by the mixing of human stem cells with embryonic animals to create new species.
National Geographic reports: ‘Biotechnology activist Jeremy Rifkin is opposed to crossing species boundaries, because he believes animals have the right to exist without being tampered with or crossed with another species. He concedes that these studies would lead to some medical breakthroughs. Still, they should not be done.
"There are other ways to advance medicine and human health besides going out into the strange, brave new world of chimeric animals," Rifkin said, adding that sophisticated computer models can substitute for experimentation on live animals.’
Now, scientists in New Zealand have been given the green-light for injecting human genes into cows, goats, and sheep, for research experiments conducted by AgResearch at their Ruakura research facility in Hamilton.
Maybe those people who’ve been saying that the government have secret bases where they are carrying out bizarre genetic experiments weren’t quite so crazy after all…?
7. The Weaponry of the Near Future
Mind-blowing new technology is being prepared to fight the wars of the future. An article that appeared recently in the Telegraph claims that British military scientists are close to developing ‘Star Trek-style force-field armour’ for tanks.
The article says:
‘When a threat from incoming fire is detected by the vehicle, the energy stored in the supercapacitor can be rapidly dumped onto the metal plating on the outside of the vehicle, producing a strong electromagnetic field.
Scientists behind the project claim this would produce a momentary "force field" capable of repelling the incoming rounds and projectiles.
Although it would last for only a fraction of a second, if timed correctly it could prevent rocket propelled grenades, which detonate on impact, from reaching their target. The supercapacitor could then be rapidly recharged ready for another attack.
The idea is similar to the force fields portrayed in science fiction movies which produce an invisible protective shell around a vehicle or object.’
The armour is so attractive because it is so light – normally you would expect armour that protects from RPGs to be heavy and cumbersome, but the force-field armour has the supercapacitor, which makes it light and allows for greater mobility.
A 2008 report from AP on the ‘invisible’ camouflage technology that is being developed
Some of the most important steps to developing a true, sci-fi style invisibility cloak have been made by scientists in the US. Researchers in the UK had already developed a theoretical framework for how one could be made, but now David Smith and colleagues at Duke University in North Carolina have proved that the idea can actually work. New Scientist explains the device as such: ‘The cloak works by steering microwave light around an object, making it appear to an observer as if it were not there at all. Materials that bend light in this way do not exist naturally, so have to be engineered with the necessary optical properties.’
The cloaking device developed back then in 2006 was a huge breakthrough, but far from perfect, since it only works in the microwave region of the EM spectrum. But it was a huge step towards the real deal, which may very well be coming to country near you in the not-too-distant future.
In fact, researchers have since expanded the range that the cloaking device can conceal. ‘The new device can cloak a much wider spectrum of waves — nearly limitless — and will scale far more easily to infrared and visible light’ said senior researcher David R Smith.
The research was supported by Raytheon Missile Systems, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, amongst others.
As if that’s all outlandish enough, robotics and engineering firm Sarcos have created robotic exoskeletons for US soldiers to wear, which allow them to do physical feats they could not do before, such as lifting objects that are hundreds of pounds in weight, with ease.
Sarcos’ Exoskeletons
8. The Space Race
In 2008, Subrata Roy, a mechanical and aerospace engineering associate professor at the University of Florida, filed a patent for a type of ‘flying saucer’ craft. The saucer-craft, or Wingless Electromagnetic Air Vehicle (WEAV), has attracted a lot of attention from NASA and the US Air Force. The idea basically is that it flies by converting surrounding air into plasma, which means that though it cannot fly in space, it would be great for exploring other planets and moons, as well as for military operations.
Anthony Colozza, a researcher with Analex Corporation who is stationed at NASA’s Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, helped with the original WEAV plans, and says that there are a few obstacles to overcome first before the saucer is in working condition.
An artist's depiction of the WEAV flying-saucer
Well, they claim the vehicle is not yet in working condition (at least they did 2 years ago), but why is it that people in the western world keep seeing strange flying-saucer craft in the skies? In fact, 2008 saw a surge of ‘flying-saucer’ UFO sightings across the UK, according to the Telegraph:
‘Among mysterious flying objects spotted in recent months was a 'glowing' disc spotted above the M5 motorway. Royal Navy aircraft engineer Michael Madden said he watched the UFO for three minutes before it 'zoomed off' near Weston-super-Mare in Somerset.
Earlier, in Basingstoke, witnesses claimed to have seen a fleet of 12 orange objects in the night sky for half an hour.
And in St Athan in the Vale of Glamorgan a police helicopter crew gave chase to another UFO after it appeared to veer at speed towards their aircraft.’
Are we supposed to believe all of these are just natural gas, or something? Or that they’ve even travelled here from other planets? It doesn’t take a NASA rocket scientist to see the obvious here – they say they’ve almost developed flying-saucer aircraft, and people are seeing flying saucers all over the place.
Hmm, what can that tell you?
UFOs and strange craft caught on NASA’s official footage
Maybe they just aren’t telling us the full truth, perhaps…?
UFO researchers and investigators have for years been highlighting New Mexico as a hive for UFO sightings and activity, since there are government facilities located in the desert. But now, the Virgin Galactic spacecraft company landed a deal in 2005 to build a large spaceport in New Mexico for space tourism and space travel. According to news website Space.com, the first flights of a suborbital space-liner were intended to be launched in 2008/2009. The space flights are reported to be so costly, I don’t think they’ll be available to most – only people with wealth enough to afford it.
Space-ports might sound like something of strictly science-fiction, but the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST) has already licensed five spaceports in the US: California Spaceport at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Spaceport Florida at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, the Virginia Space Flight Center at Wallops Island, Kodiak Launch Complex on Kodiak Island, Alaska, and Mojave Airport in California.
Conceptual artwork of the Virgin Spaceport in New Mexico from 2005
The Pentagon have been hugely interested in ‘space-dominance’ and ‘space wars’, as they are known, in this new era of space flight and travel. In 2005, The New York Times reported that General Lance W. Lord, then commander of AFSPC, told an Air Force conference that ‘space superiority is not our birthright, but it is our destiny. ... Space superiority is our day-to-day mission. Space supremacy is our vision for the future.’
The Neo-Con think-tank during the Bush Administration, the Project for a New American Century, suggested the ‘creation of “US Space Forces” to dominate space’ in the document ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses.
Now, the Defense Department wants new, destabilizing weapons systems that will transform low-earth and high-earth orbit into another ‘battlespace,’ pouring billions into programs to achieve what Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) has long dreamed of: ‘space dominance.’
Why are they so interested in space dominance? I thought the Global Elite already dominate most of the world, why are they frightened of other countries? Well, maybe the answer is a little more bizarre than most might at first assume.
As far back as 1999, past-and-present members of the French Government, along with various other experts in the field, produced a document known as the ‘COMETA Report’ which analysed the phenomenon known as ‘UFOs’. The document was presented to French President Jacque Chirac, and explained how some UFO cases are explainable by simple terrestrial phenomena, but also concluded that actual aircraft are being sighted, and that they may even have an extraterrestrial origin.
Former head of the UK’s Ministry of Defence project on studying UFOs, Nick Pope, became convinced that some UFOs are extraterrestrial in origin, after spending time studying them. In 2006, he told the UK Daily Mail that he believes aliens could attack at ‘any time’, saying:
‘"If you believe these things are extra terrestrial craft then you cannot rule out that what is happening is some kind of covert reconnaissance."
One incident which persuaded him of the existence of alien lifeforms was in 1993. There were reports of a "vast, triangular-shaped craft" spotted flying over RAF bases in the West Midlands.
"Most of the witnesses were police and military personnel,"’
Maybe the Global Elite are worried about something a lot more potentially dangerous than some ‘rival country’ – extraterrestrial civilisations! It certainly would explain the streams of money going towards space-dominance. as depicted in the film adaptation of H G Wells' novel, 'Things to Come', the elite plan to, after conquering Planet Earth, spread out into the galaxy and settle other planets to form a fledgling galactic empire.
'When you lose small mind, you free your life' - System of a Down, Aerials
So, as you can see, the world we inhabit is a far cry from what is portrayed on the evening news. I hope you can see now that limiting your horizons does no good whatsoever – you need to expand them in order to learn new information, and see the world from a different perspective.
We really are living in an incredible Final-Fantasy-type world – the world is a wonderful, colourful place, you need only open your mind to explore it all for yourself. The Global Elite try to limit our horizons, and get us trapped in a mental prison of limited possibility and perception, and they have a whole scientific dictatorship set up to keep us down.
A very accurate portrayal of the truth that I have seen is the Playstation game ‘Half-Life’, in which the main character works in a top-secret, extensive underground facility, where bizarre scientific experiments are carried out. It was the debut game of Valve Software, which was founded by two former Microsoft employees, so maybe the games were based on some kind of insider knowledge…? Who knows…
And yes I know, it appears that humanity is severely inserted up shit creek, but stay tuned and I’ll be posting more up on this site soon about how this whole Global Agenda is being turned around.
hairbrushguzzle
DISCLAIMER: this is a blog of personal opinions and views - if you disagree with or dislike what is written here, that is fine. any websites that are linked to or mentioned in this this blog are not necessarily endorsed by or representative of the view of the writer(s) of the blog in any shape or form.
Saturday, 19 June 2010
Monday, 24 May 2010
The Cameron Chronicles - the Making of a Puppet-Prime-Minister (Memory Note no. 1)
click here to read memory note no. 2
click here to read memory note no. 3
click here to read memory note no. 4
‘To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity’ - Oscar Wilde
‘The world is governed by very different personages than what is imagined by those not behind the scenes’ – Benjamin Disraeli, Conservative Prime Minister of the UK, Coningsby
Personally, I have been quite surprised watching this recent General Election in the UK unfold – mostly surprised by how many people I had thought were intelligent and aware of some of the levels of corruption and special interests manipulating the British establishment, get fooled. There are many reasons to see this election as a stage-managed farce benefitting the few at the expense of the many – the corrupt establishment, wealthy dynasties using their influence to manipulate a certain outcome, and much more serious ones as well – and this blog is an attempt to document and detail many of those reasons.
We as a people need desperately to wake up to how elections are staged, and how, though the resident Prime-Minister of Downing Street may change, the same interests go on running the show from behind the scenes. We need to because our freedoms, civil liberties, and future as the people of this country and as a species depend on it.
There are 4 memory-notes you must bear in mind that will help you understand why and how General Elections in the UK are a farce, and what we can do about it:
Memory note no. 1 – the Agenda of the super-powerful
‘The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of this country.
‘...We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, largely by men we have never heard of.’ – Edward Bernays, the ‘father’ of modern propaganda and ‘PR’ techniques, Propaganda, p.37
One historian who has written about the wealthy families and dynasties manipulating the UK and the western world for their own goals is Professor of Georgetown University Carroll Quigley (1910 - 1977). Quigley was also a mentor to Rhodes Scholar Bill Clinton, who thanked him for his mentorship in his address to the Democratic National Convention in New York upon accepting the Presidential nomination. Quigley had access to secret archives of documents most historians do not, and he published his study of those documents in his 1966 book, ‘Tragedy and Hope’. In that 1348 page book, Quigley gives a fairly different view of the history of the ‘Anglo-American Establishment’ as he had called it.
He explains (as he had previously written in his 1949/1981 book ‘The Anglo-American Establishment’) that the agent of the tyrannical and racist British Empire in South Africa, Cecil Rhodes (1853-1902), left money in his Will that was to go towards a Secret Society that had been formed. This Secret Society had as its goal the protection and supremacy of the British Empire throughout the world, and Quigley named it ‘the Milner Group’ after one of its most important members, Alfred Milner. Quigley also writes that this Secret Society could also be called ‘The Round Table Group’, and is one of ‘the most important historical facts of the twentieth century’. As the saying goes ‘the sun never set on the British Empire…’
Carroll Quigley said that the money was left to establish the ‘Rhodes Scholarships’, which would be used to train young people to serve the Society. He also said that Lord Nathan Rothschild (1840-1915) was a member of this Round Table Society – and it’s the Rothschild family that I want to focus on in this blog.
The Rothschilds are an international banking dynasty, which can be traced back to Germany of the early 1700s, where they were known as the ‘Bauers’. In 1743 a goldsmith named Amschel Moses Bauer opened a coin shop in Frankfurt, Germany, and hung above his door a sign depicting a Roman eagle on a red shield. The shop became known as the Red Shield firm. The German word for 'red shield' is ‘Rothschild’ – hence their next family name. Amschel had 5 sons who he trained to further expand the family business of banking.
The shield that heralded the name that would become synonymous with international financial power - Rothschild
Over time, the Rothschild dynasty became hugely powerful, especially in England. As I wrote in a previous blog:
‘Nathan Rothschild financed British forces, led by Lord Wellington, against Napoleon. However, a Rothschild agent was the first to relay the news of Wellington’s victory over Napoleon specifically to Rothschild. Rothschild then put out the rumour to the London Stock Exchange that Napoleon had in fact won, and as a result stocks plummeted. This then allowed Rothschild to buy up much of the British economy. However, when it later came out that the British had indeed won, the stocks soared up again, and Rothschild therefore dominated the soaring British economy. The Rothschilds have enjoyed incredible influence and power ever since.’
Various historical researchers and authors since Quigley have indeed agreed with his conclusions about this manipulative Secret Society, and as I have detailed in previous blogs, it is indeed true that a powerful ‘Elite’ class of the world use various Secret Societies to affect and steer world events in their favour. It is also worth pointing out that this ‘Round Table Group’ appears to have as their goal the supremacy of the tyrannical aspects of the British Empire – the authoritarianism of the British Empire prior to the signing of the Magna Carta (which established basic Human Rights for British citizens). I’m talking about the British Empire that was ruled by hereditary Elite, and where any citizens who speak out against those Elite are brutally murdered and/or tortured in torture dungeons. Remember, the British Empire was the most far-reaching and expansive empire in recorded history, coming fairly close to having total world rule – a World Dictatorship with a unified World State.
Carroll Quigley wrote that this ‘Milner Group’ – The Round Table Secret Society – established various front groups, organisations, and ‘Think-Tanks’, who certainly have supported our modern authoritarian Big-Brother government policies, and our move towards world unification and ‘globalisation’. He wrote that these groups and think-tanks are run by an ‘inner-core’ – the Round Table agents – while the majority of attendants at the meetings and discussions are merely unsuspecting ‘outsiders’ who are used to implement its goals.
The groups he said they established for this end were:
The Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) or ‘Chatham House’:
Round Table members met at the Versailles Peace Conference in Paris in 1919 after World War One and decided to establish a ‘think-tank’ to debate and discuss various issues on UK foreign policy, and use the mass of participants at the discussions to further their agenda of world control. They founded the ‘Royal Institute of International Affairs’ (RIIA) in London, which has served their purpose ever since. The RIIA, or ‘Chatham House’ as it has become known, is very secretive, and operates under what has become known as the ‘Chatham House Rule’ – no one present at the discussions can talk about any of the discussions outside of Chatham House. The meetings are attended by people of influence in media, politics, education, and commerce, but the actual membership list is kept secret from anyone on the outside. Most people there are oblivious to the existence of the Round Table, except of course for the inner-core members of Chatham House, who are themselves Round Table agents.
The ‘Director of Studies’ at Chatham House, Arnold Toynbee, said in 1931, ‘We are at present working, discreetly with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called [national] sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of the world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands.’
Basically: ‘I am part of a secretive cabal seeking to get rid of independent nations in favour of unified world governance. Never mind what the people want, what WE want is best – authoritarian world governance, British-style’
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR):
The Council on Foreign Relations was, shortly after it’s founding in 1919, completely controlled by members of the Round Table as a ‘sister-organisation’ of Chatham House in the US, basically the American version of the RIIA. It works in pretty much the same way as Chatham House, but is slightly less secretive – the membership list is public, and as a result, we know who in the American establishment is a member and who is not. The CFR has dominated Washington since it’s founding, and also has hugely influential members in the worlds of media, banking, and business. On May 1st of 2008, the CFR launched its ‘International Institutions and Global Governance Program’ – a program geared towards, as the title states, management and governance of the planet. The program identifies several ‘global issues’ that require a system of world governance, such as environmental issues, terrorism, the global economy and energy. The project also states that a system of ‘universal membership’ could be pursued to solve the problems, or alternatively a regional organization, such as the European Union model – that is, a framework of world government. It states:
‘In each of these spheres, the program will consider whether the most promising framework for governance is a formal organization with universal membership (e.g., the United Nations); a regional or sub-regional organization; a narrower, informal coalition of like-minded countries; or some combination of all three.’
Only 2 years previously, the president of the CFR Richard N Haas, Obama’s State Department Special Envoy, had stated in an article called ‘Sovereignty and Globalisation’ that all nations must ‘weaken [national] sovereignty in order to protect themselves’ and that we must ‘find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy’. Is the inner-core of the CFR pushing the Round Table Elite’s agenda of authoritarian world governance? You bet.
(…and more recently:)
The Bilderberg Group:
The Bilderberg group is a hugely secretive and hugely powerful annual meeting that takes place in various places across the world (usually Europe), and is a major vehicle for the Round Table agenda. The first Bilderberg meeting was arranged in 1954 by MAJOR ‘globalists’ and Round Table agents, and acts in very much the same way as the CFR or Chatham House, but is much more high-profile. The Rothschild family have been deeply involved in the Bilderberg Group since its creation, and Bilderberg’s own documents were revealed by a BBC investigation that showed that they were mostly behind the creation of the Euro. As I wrote in a previous blog:
‘It consists of around a hundred or so of the most powerful people in the world: major corporate CEOs and presidents; heads of media, banking and finance; royalty; leading politicians, etc…The Bilderberg conferences are attended by a regular ‘inner-core’ of members…while ‘outer-members’ get less-frequent invites (who include major heads of media, top professors at leading universities, journalists, heads of military, etc)’
‘One reason you’ve probably never heard of such a group before is that the media is mostly owned by Bilderberg – so it never gets in the papers….The only notable exception I can think of is Charlie Skelton reporting on the Bilderberg conference last year for the Guardian newspaper…Veteran, renegade journalist Jim Tucker, who has been tirelessly researching and reporting on Bilderberg for over 30 years, says that ‘Bilderberg’s plan for the whole world is nothing less than World Government’. And that would seem to be exactly the case. In an article published in the Financial Times of London, called ‘and now for a world government’, columnist Gideon Rachman makes a case for a controlling world government. And, lo and Behold, it turns out the Financial Times is edited by Bilderberg attendee, Martin Wolf. Towards the end of the column, Rachman sneers: “International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic”’
The Trilateral Commission:
The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1975 by Round Table agents David Rockefeller (CFR, Bilderberg attendee) and polish-born Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR, Bilderberg) with contributions from the Council on Foreign Relations. Brzezinski wrote in the New York Times in 1990 that Europe should follow a policy ‘founded upon the grand concept of a trans-European commonwealth with the European Community at it’s core, but embracing Central Europe and being open also to eventual association with the Soviet Union’ – so as you can see these Round Table types have been deeply involved in the European Union. The Trilateral Commission has members that include hundreds of prominent people from the worlds of banking, business, and politics from each of three regions – Europe, North America, and Pacific Asia – hence ‘Trilateral’. It works very similarly to the CFR and Chatham House with the inner-core Round Table agents directing discussions and outsiders following along to the agenda unwittingly.
(…Also worth mentioning:)
The Fabian Society:
There are other forums and debating societies that these Elites use to discuss various aspects of their world governance agenda outside of the Round Table groups, and the Fabian Society is a major one of these. It was founded in 1884 in London and over time became a semi-secret debating society for prominent intellectuals from the ‘left’ of the spectrum who supported the move towards world management and governance by an Elite. The British intellectual, prolific author, and eugenicist, H G Wells, was a member for a time, as was intellectual and author Bertrand Russell. Both of them publicly wrote on various occasions that they supported a scientific World Government to rule the nations of the world, and in fact Russell even suggested in ‘The Impact of Science on Society’ that it might be a dictatorial scientific World Government. The brothers, Aldous Huxley and Julian Huxley, were also members, and eugenicist Julian would later help establish the United Nations education program UNESCO as part of a global education system. Aldous Huxley admitted in interviews that his novel about a scientific authoritarian World State, ‘Brave New World’, was actually based on what the Elite were planning to bring in. Another prominent Fabian, and a name you should remember for later, was George Bernard Shaw, who was a supporter of eugenics, and publicly praised dictators such as Stalin, Mussolini and Hitler.
The Fabian Society was named after the Roman General Quintus Fabius Maximus, whose strategies advocated tactics of slow, tip-toe warfare – carefully maintaining your endurance and energy while slowly wearing down and picking away at your enemy. The Elites agenda is carried out in this way – carefully, cautiously, and with tip-toe methods, not openly with full vulgarity.
The Fabian Coat of Arms – a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing…
These are some of the institutions the Round Table have established and used as means to their re-establishment of a dictatorial world-wide regime. They are hugely powerful; if you look at the corporate membership list of the CFR you will notice names like GlaxoSmithKline, Nike, Google, General Electric, IBM, British Petroleum, etc, and a brief gaze of past attendees of the Bilderberg Group reveals leadership of global corporations such as Coca-Cola, Microsoft, Google, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Royal Dutch Shell, etc. Many of these kinds of global corporations then go and pillage the world of its resources in a neo-imperialistic fashion, with no regard whatsoever for national independence and sovereignty. For example, they would do this by using third world slave-labour (paid for a pittance) to make their products, while selling those products for extortionate amounts in the wealthier nations. As some case studies of this, you could study Bechtel privatising Bolivia’s water supply, Wal-Mart using Chinese slave-labour, or Nike using Indonesian sweat-shops. The global corporations team up with international institutions set up largely by Elite globalists, such as the US-dominated World Bank and European-dominated IMF (both co-founded by Fabian socialist and eugenicist John Maynard Keynes) and the World Trade Organisation. This global neo-imperialism is of course the unfolding of the Elite’s world governance system.
The hugely influential Rockefeller family have been major Round Table agents in the US, and the United Nations (which is a tip-toe towards world governance) was built on Rockefeller-donated land.
These Roundtable Elites desire to divide the world up into centralised regions through which they can then manage the planet – such as the European Union and the North American Union.
The European Union:
As I mentioned previously, the European Union (EU) has largely been the creation of the Round Table group (Carroll Quigley’s ‘Milner Group’) – A BBC investigation unearthed Bilderberg documents from 1955 that outlined a plan for a single European currency. That plan obviously came to fruition, hence the ‘Euro’. Remember, the plan is dictatorial world management – a million times easier with a single European currency, and world super-states like the EU ruling over nation states. In fact, a former Soviet Union dissident went public in 2006 stating that
he believes the European Union is becoming another ‘Soviet Union’. The 63-year-old Vladimir Bukovsky referred to confidential documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to read in 1992. These documents confirm the existence of a ‘conspiracy’ to turn the European Union into what he calls a ‘totalitarian state’.
The European Union currently has a project underway to create an EU-wide surveillance system dedicated to continuous tracking and monitoring of all ‘web sites, discussion forums, usenet groups, file servers, p2p networks [and] individual computer systems’. The project is called ‘Project Indect’, and is intended to also use CCTV feeds and other surveillance methods to develop models of ‘suspicious behaviour’ in citizens of the EU, by analyzing the pitch of people’s voices (suggesting that private conversations will be recorded) as well as ‘the way their bodies move’. I hope you’re starting to understand the scale and reality of this Round Table agenda, because it’s serious business.
The new President of the European Union declares that 2009 marks the first year of world-management and ‘Global Governance’
The North American Union:
The North American Union (NAU) has been proposed and stealthily implemented for more than 5 years now, intended to become the American counterpart of the EU. In 2006, public interest group Judicial Watch managed to obtain documents from a secret meeting held in Waco, Texas, that was launched by US President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Prime Minister of Canada Paul Martin, called the ‘North American partnership’ meeting. According to Judicial Watch, the documents reveal that the meeting revolved around the secretive and controversial Security and Prosperity Partnership between the 3 countries, and that at that meeting:
‘the partnership’s ‘working groups’ include government and business leaders from the United States, Mexico and Canada, who are addressing a variety of topics, including movement of goods between countries, traveller security, energy, environment and health. Proponents of the partnership claim its purpose is to increase security and prosperity for all three nations through enhanced cooperation. Critics maintain the partnership will sacrifice U.S. sovereignty by establishing a “North American Union,” with open borders and a common currency.’
A year later, Judicial Watch also managed to obtain documents from US Northern Command (NORTHCOM). They revealed that NORTHCOM Commander, Admiral Timothy Keating, NORTHCOM Political Advisor Deborah Bolton, and Plans, Policy & Strategy Director Major General Mark Volcheff attended a meeting of the ‘North American Forum’ at the Banff Springs Hotel in Banff, Canada on September 12-14, 2006. They also discussed the Security and Prosperity Partnerships, and stated that the North American Union would be brought about through ‘evolution by stealth’.
News clip from CNN Host Lou Dobbs on the ‘Orwellian’ North American Union
This is not a plan for supremacy of the country ‘Britain’ – it is the plan for an international world order of global control with hereditary international Elites dominating the peoples of the world, a much more modern and sophisticated ‘British Empire’. As Carroll Quigley wrote in ‘Tragedy and Hope’:
‘The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks, which were themselves private corporations’
Only about a month before the time of writing this blog, the head of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, announced in a speech before the Council on Foreign Relations in the US that a model of ‘global governance’ should be imposed, headed by the Bank for International Settlements mentioned in the previous quote. One of the main themes of his speech was ‘global governance’, and he said the Elite should enforce ‘a set of rules, institutions, informal groupings and cooperation mechanisms that we call “global governance”’.
The plan of the Round Table is unfolding before our eyes.
Also, this is not all some natural outgrowth of Capitalism, it is ‘Globalism’ – the Elite are monopolists who do not desire open competition, they want to win the ‘game’ before it’s even begun. What we call ‘globalisation’ is a part of this ‘Globalism’ Quigley wrote about.
The first human civilisations were formed by human beings working together – in games strategy it’s called ‘Tit-for-Tat’, which basically means ‘if you hurt me, I’ll hurt you back – if you help me, I’ll help you back’. Humans basically found that working together is much more productive and fun than killing each other, and produces greater chances of survival for all. As the saying goes: ‘you scratch my back, I scratch yours.’
However, after this phase, psychopathic personalities got involved in this ‘civilisation’ malark, and the first dictatorships were born. The dictionary definition of a ‘psychopath’ reads: ‘somebody affected with a personality disorder marked by aggressive, violent, antisocial behaviour and a lack of remorse or empathy’ – so as you can imagine, they rose to positions of power, since they can make cold-blooded decisions about human life and all those decisions will be geared towards meticulously getting more power for themselves. And the smarter the psychopath, the more powerful he, or she, will become.
These psychopathic personalities became leaders of large civilisations, and this is where cold-blooded conquest-and-empire comes from. Instead of ‘you scratch my back, I scratch yours’ as it is with the likes of us, with them it’s ‘you scratch my back, now go fight my wars – I AM YOUR LEADER!’
It is these kinds of personalities that were behind some of the biggest tyrannies of history – such as the Soviet Union, Communist China, Nazi Germany, the tyranny of the British Empire, etc, and this current move to world control by the families of the Round Table.
What the Elite are aiming for is a kind of global cartel, or global monopoly – a unified world whereby all resources and government policies are controlled by a small clique of wealthy families from the worlds of business, industry, finance, and politics. All the peoples of the world would then answer to this world authority – the cartel composed of these super-powerful families.
Henry Kissinger (CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral), Alan Greenspan (CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral), Bill Gates (Bilderberg), George H W Bush (CFR, Trilateral), and many other ‘pillars’ of the supposedly independent United States have all received knighthoods of the British Empire, which of course would be due to their efforts in fighting for the bloodthirsty House of Windsor/Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and the tyrannical ‘British’ Empire in it’s covert modern form. Remember, in the British armed forces, you swear an oath of allegiance to ‘Queen and country’, which means something different to ‘the British people’…
Wouldn’t it be nice if the US had a president with a backbone?
Mayor of New York on 9/11 Rudy Giuliani is awarded a knighthood of the British Empire by the Queen – must be because of his incredible leadership skills in preventing the horrific attacks
Now, the Rothschild family are towards the heart of this stuff, and they might be a Jewish family, but it is NOT a ‘Jewish conspiracy’ – the Round Table group do NOT favour Jews, blacks, Asians, whites, or any particular group of people bar themselves.
In fact, some agents of the Round Table Group, towards the outside, have hated Jews – for example, American eugenics-supporter Henry Ford, who Hitler admired. Henry Ford founded the Ford Motor Company and the tax-exempt Ford Foundation, and provided industry for the Nazi Party in Germany during World War II, despite the fact that the US was at war with them.
Henry Ford, who Adolf Hitler drew inspiration from, hated Jewish people. He founded the Ford Foundation, which has assisted the agenda of the Elite and the Round Table
Round Table support of Nazi Germany came in the form of financial backing – The Bush family funded the Nazi regime through the Union Banking Corporation (UBC). As John Loftus, president of the Florida Holocaust Museum, told the Sarasota Reading Festival in 2001 in a speech he delivered there: ‘that’s where the Bush family fortune came from: it came from the Third Reich’. The Rockefeller family also provided financial support for the Nazis by funding the work of Ernst Rudin, one of the foremost Nazi ‘racial hygienists’, at Germany’s Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology, and Human Heredity. Edward the VIII, the British monarch, publicly supported Hitler, and the British Royal Family went to visit him in 1937.
Remember the Fabian, George Bernard Shaw? He was indeed a supporter of the eugenics movement that inspired the Nazis, and he personally made suggestions that certain weak, burdensome people should be quietly exterminated in gas-chambers years BEFORE the Nazi party had begun doing such things in Germany.
Remember, the Nazi Party were originally simply a fascist party driven by an ideology of eugenics – rigid racial hierarchy, authoritarianism, and the massacre of dissenters were all characteristics of the tyranny of the British Empire, what the Round Table are seeking to create . It was after the Nazis began openly announcing ‘we’re going to take over the world’ and began implementing their policies in a fast, no-holds-barred fashion that the war broke out. The Elite favour careful tip-toe methods – the Fabian way – not quick-and-fast ‘do-what-we-say-now-or-die’ methods.
Based on my understanding of all this, I also do not believe it is really a ‘conspiracy’ – these people believe that to bring the world under their control would be one of the best things they could do for us all, a dream I’m sure has been shared by many dictators throughout history.
click here to read memory note no. 2
The Cameron Chronicles - the Making of a Puppet-Prime-Minister (Memory Note no. 2)
click here to read memory note no. 1
click here to read memory note no. 3
click here to read memory note no. 4
Memory note no. 2 – what is 'Democracy' anyway?
‘Democracy is the recurrent suspicion that more than half of the people are right more than half of the time.’ – Elwyn Brooks White, in ‘The New Yorker’, 1943
‘Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few’ - George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman, page 182, 1903
As I have explained, these Elite families have great control over western politics, and the UK is of course no exception. What they tend to do is make sure that they own and control all major candidates in elections. As this article explains, the Rothschild family have had great influence over politics for over 200 years now, and have enormous control of both Peter Mandelson (the real power of the Labour Party) and George Osborne of the Conservative Party – so they really can’t lose when it comes to elections. They also provided support for John McCain’s presidential campaign. The article from the Independent says:
‘Political donations from overseas are also illegal in the US, where John McCain's campaign team is under investigation for allegedly accepting a benefit in kind from two mega-rich British citizens, namely Nat Rothschild and his father, Jacob, the Fourth Baron Rothschild. In April, Mr McCain passed through London and spoke at a fund-raising dinner for expatriate Americans…What caught the eye of Judicial Watch, a Washington-based foundation dedicated to combating corruption, was that the event was held "by kind permission of Lord Rothschild and Hon Nathaniel Rothschild" at the family home in Spencer House, St James's’
Round Table agents backed and controlled Obama, McCain, and Sarah Palin (all of which have blue-blood connections to Europe) in the recent US Presidential Election – so you see, they couldn’t fail to get into power. They own all the horses in the race!
These super-powerful families then use the media, such as the BBC, ABC News, CBS, Fox News, etc, to only give favourable coverage to the candidates that they want to get into the final race for the presidency/premiership.
For example, in September of 2009, former director-general of the BBC, Greg Dyke, told a Liberal Democrat Party conference that there is a ‘conspiracy’ between the BBC and the UK Government in Westminster. He said major changes he had wanted to make to the BBC's coverage of politics when he was director-general had been blocked, and that the Labour Party and the BBC ‘are part of one Westminster conspiracy’ which came to his attention mostly after the white-wash ‘Hutton Inquiry’ into the suspicious death of David Kelly.
This is exactly the way it works with the media, especially considering how major names in politics, media, and royalty all meet up at the Bilderberg Group and such, and discuss world events. Public attention and favour is directed towards certain potential Presidents and Prime Ministers through the media, and the unsuspecting, mostly unconscious public never realise that they are being manipulated to vote for candidates that have been chosen for them! Under the old British imperialism it was – ‘we will decide who rules you, so you will do as we tell you!’ under modern-day democracy (hidden empire) it is – ‘we’ve given you the right to choose who rules you, so you are free to choose between who we have decided to rule you!’
‘I talk democracy to these men and women. I tell them that they have the vote, and that theirs is the kingdom and the power and the glory. I say to them, “you are supreme: exercise your power”. They say, “That's right – tell us what to do”, and I tell them. I say, “Exercise your vote intelligently by voting for me”. And they do. That's democracy; and a splendid thing it is too for putting the right men in the right place.’ – George Bernard Shaw
As the quote from Edward Bernays says at the beginning of this blog, ‘the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society’ – that’s what democracy means – public opinion is moulded by the Elite in favour of whoever the Elite have decided will be Prime Minister/President, as this article explains.
I guess in principle democracy could work, but in practice there are a lot of serious flaws with it. It is of course better than open tyranny, and it would help if we didn’t have inbred dynasties trying to take over the world and mould public opinion, but that still doesn’t mean it’s the cure for all our ills. In my view, a Republic works a fair bit better, and I suppose a system of proportional representation in the UK would reflect public opinion a bit better, but that still doesn’t change the fact that public opinion is being artificially moulded by the Elite. The sleeping masses of the UK are mostly completely unaware of the Elite and their agenda, so in practice, our democracy simply doesn’t keep us a free country.
We might see Tony Blair or David Cameron in the headlines of the newspapers, about how ‘they’ decided to go war, how ‘they’ are keeping the economy in shape, etc, with a big blown-up image of their face on the front page, but we rarely hear about what’s going on in the background behind them.
Presidents and Prime-Ministers are like a brand logo – like the ‘M’ of MacDonald’s or the ‘goddess’ symbol of Starbucks.
Another analogy might be a singer like Britney Spears or something – she is the one singing the songs, but her songs are mostly written FOR her to perform by another musician employed by her Recording Label. Her stage-shows are also managed by her Label, and the Label’s management transport her from place to place to do interviews and performances in places THEY have mostly decided – the guys ‘behind-the-scenes’. You see HER face on the magazines and you might think it’s HER idea, but mostly it’s the management working behind the scenes. She just sings off the song-sheet written FOR her, so to speak.
By the way, I’m not bashing Britney Spears; I’m just describing how Prime-Ministers and Presidents are stage-managed and mostly used as ‘fronts’ for the Global Elite.
Whoever you vote for, they’re all stage-managed by the same Global Elite
It’s like a magician’s trick – he keeps you focused and intrigued by something he’s doing with his right hand, and so you never look at the background and see what he’s doing with his left hand, and it looks like he’s performed some miraculous feat. People then gasp in awe ‘wow, look at how powerful he is!’, but it’s all a big trick, it’s an illusion.
What the Elite do is keep you focused on Tony Blair or George Bush or someone, while the guys in the background – the Prime Minister’s aides, allies, and masters – go about running the country. Then you gasp in awe (or horror) at how ‘Gordon Brown’, or ‘David Cameron’, or ‘Barack Obama’, or ‘Bill Clinton’, etc, are running the country. And you demand someone new instead.
The idea is that the masses of people never realise that it doesn’t matter what face (Brown, Blair, Bush, Clinton, Cameron, Obama, etc) is voted for – the ‘Corporation’ or ‘Elite’ BEHIND the face go on doing what they did before.
The days of obedience to authoritarian monarchs and Elites have never gone away.
A video explaining how the Elite control politics
click here to read memory note no. 3
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)