Wednesday, 25 November 2009

Welcome to Planet Reptile – Part 1

I have taken a lot of time making sure that this particular blog is totally documented and based in verifiable fact, so please, I would encourage you to look up the links in the blog, just right click on blue words and click on ‘open in new tab’ to view the source…

‘Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I’m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That’s what’s insane about it’ - John Lennon


‘Imagine there’s no heaven, it’s easy if you try
No Hell below us, above us only sky.
Imagine all the people, living for today.
Imagine there’s no countries, it isn’t hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too.
Imagine all the people, living life in peace’

‘Imagine’ by John Lennon

‘If fifty-million people say a foolish thing – it is still a foolish thing’ - Anatole France

Before I begin on this blog, there are some things I want to get straight first…

Some of the information in this particular blog will be quite challenging to most belief systems, and some people may even term it ‘paranoid’ or ‘schizophrenic’. However, since ‘paranoid’ simply means unnecessarily fearful and ‘schizophrenic’ simply means delusional, such terms would not be accurate because 1. I am not afraid with this information and 2. I do actually have evidence for these things.
Besides, a few hundred years ago, when Galileo publicly stated that he supported the Copernican model of the Earth revolving around the Sun, he was widely condemned for going against the official orthodoxy. The Church says the sun revolves around the Earth, so it must be true! Besides, this is what we have already established, everyone knows it’s true!
Galileo was attacked and dismissed as a crank, etc, but eventually, over time, the idea gained credence and the tides were turned. And you would think people would have learned not to be so ‘sheep-like’ since then…

Back then, the ‘buzz-words’ thrown around by the authorities at anyone who questioned their official orthodoxy were ‘Heretic’ and ‘Demon-Possessed’. Nowadays, since we’re living in a ‘scientific’ age, where the priests and holy-men have been replaced by psychiatrists and technocrats, those words have been substituted for psychiatric terms like: ‘paranoid’ and ‘schizophrenic’. So long as we throw those words at someone who says something we don’t like, we don’t have to consider or look at what they’re saying, and we can potter around in our happy little lives pretending that everything’s perfectly fine and will work itself out in the end. In short, we don’t have to take any responsibility for anything really important.

If a large, influential organisation of con-men, criminals, or nutcases claim to have dubious ‘revelations’ and ‘great perceptions’, and manage to convert millions of people to adhere to their new belief system, then we call these new beliefs a ‘religion’ or ‘the official story’ or something. However, if one single person begins to unveil factual information contradicting much of what the masses around them believe, that person is usually labelled a ‘conspiracy theorist’, a ‘heretic’, or an ‘extremist’ or a ‘hater’.
It’s what the majority of people believe that sets the standard, not actual validity or evidence. For example, which of these sounds more like a paranoid theory?

1. That extremely powerful, influential people could conspire and successfully get a prominent politician or president assassinated (say, JFK or Princess Diana…)


2. That there is this all-pervading intelligence that is watching every move you make, hearing your every thought, and judging it all. If you don’t do what this intelligence has demanded, then when you die you will suffer eternal torment at the hands of fiery demons with pitchforks. The only real proof that this intelligence exists is a single book of dubious origin, claiming to be the word of this ‘God’, who is the absolute authority on everything.

Well, to me, that first one pales in comparison to the second one! But yet it is considered a ‘conspiracy theory’, even a ‘paranoid’ one, if you point out that, say, Princess Diana said that the Windsor’s may get her assassinated in a car crash shortly before she actually died, in a suspicious car crash!
Different variations of the second belief are actually what millions of people worldwide really believe, and it’s called a ‘religion’ and taken very seriously. Very seriously indeed. In fact, it’s considered a ‘proper’ belief system, and it’s called ‘Christianity’.

How many people have dismissed claims that, say, JFK or Diana were assassinated by a co-ordinated conspiracy just because it runs contrary to what ‘everyone else thinks’, and how many people convert to a religion, and consider it ‘good and proper’, just because millions of other people adhere to it? Really makes you wonder how the hell human civilisation has gotten so far, with people being so ‘sheep-like’!

Religiously defending the official orthodoxy, mindlessly sticking to the established viewpoint, has led to so much bloodshed throughout the years it is absolutely mind-blowing. The 200-year Medieval Crusades, waged between 1095 and 1291 for the acquisition of the Christian ‘holy-land’, led to the deaths of what is estimated as over a million people.

The Medieval Inquisitions were aimed at peoples who were termed ‘heretics’ and believed things contrary to Church teachings, and led to mass persecution, and even execution, of such peoples within Europe.

The Holocaust carried out by the Nazis against their ‘enemies’, the ‘Final Solution’ as it was known, was of course all based on fraudulent Eugenics pseudo-science and the dogmatic creed known as ‘Nazism’. The people in the concentration camps were told that they were just going to have showers in the gas chambers, and as a result unknowingly walked on in to be exterminated. Do you think the Nazis implementing the Hitlerian Hell took a moment out to rethink their actions? Do you think they took their own, unique, individual views and moved away from the official sick, authoritarian Nazi creed? No, the majority of them most definitely did not. They just lined up rank-and-file and carried out orders unquestioningly.
Why don’t we learn from the mistakes of those innocent civilians, and the millions of others throughout history that have been unknowingly exterminated by a power-mad state? You would think people would have cottoned-on by now to the way things tend to work: unquestioningly conform and obey authority, and you end up getting burnt, at worst you end up with mass bloodshed and enslavement.

What about Israeli Zionists, unquestioningly obeying the official Israeli assertion that Palestine is part of the ‘Holy Land’ that needs to be acquired through any means necessary - bloodshed and warfare included? Imagine the peace that would be in the Middle-East if people stopped just religiously believing that bloodshed is the only answer (people of all faiths, that is), and that the ends justify the means because ‘god demands it!’ etc…

Now, of course, all of this doesn’t mean that just because something goes against the generally accepted reality it is true, that would just be silly. But it does mean that clinging to your belief system religiously, and trying to MAKE other people believe your beliefs, is quite simply a bad thing.

If we all lived by a simple phrase, the world would generally be a much nicer place to live: ‘To each his own’ (meaning, ‘people are free to live as they want, as long as no one forces their beliefs on anyone else).
Such a simple phrase carries such potentially massive implications, it’s quite staggering. But such a small phrase also carries such extreme inherent wisdom. Think of the peace and co-operation that would be manifest on the world if people simply adhered to that saying.
So, as you read through this article, please just bear it in mind, and please try not to cling to your current beliefs too desperately. Changing your beliefs in view of new information is really actually a positive thing; it’s called ‘learning’ and it does you a world of good.

Now that that’s out of the way, let’s get into to the blog itself…

‘world events do not occur by accident: they are made to happen, whether it is to do with national issues or commerce; and most of them are staged and managed by those who hold the purse strings’ – former British Defence Minister and Bilderberg Conference Attendee, Denis Healey

If you keep your eye on the headlines that come out of the mainstream media daily, then you’ll probably begin to realise that a lot of people in positions of power – the politicians, the bankers, the corporations – have their own agendas for the world, agendas that usually run contrary to what best benefits the general population.
MPs enjoying frivolities at the tax-payers expense, Parliament introducing legislation that kills off the British public’s right to a fair trial (Habeas Corpus) under the guise of ‘fighting terrorists’, parents being banned from playing with their children in certain parks because it suits government bureaucrats, Draconian police powers designed for crime barons being extended to councils for use against the public, cameras being put into airports to scan images of people’s naked figures, again to ‘fight the evil terrorists’, there are new examples in the newspapers every single day.


For example, the UK government has been planning on creating a database that will hold details of every phone call, e-mail, and most internet activity of the British public as part of the ‘fight against terror’. It has been proposed since at least early 2008, but has been deeply controversial (as you would expect), and has met much resistance. However, the government’s personal agenda for such draconian control measures means that such resistance is mostly ignored, and the implementation of the control system marches on.

And that’s not all.

Police officers with submachine guns are now on routine foot patrol throughout London, and the Orwellian ‘Ministry of Defence’s’ own documents have been leaked that describe journalists as a dangerous ‘threat’, documents that were leaked not long before The Guardian was actually questionably ‘gagged’ (banned) from reporting on parliament.

A BBC news report on an horrific case of police brutality in Essex. Sadly, it is just one case of many.

The exact same kind of things are happening the US as well, just being implemented in slightly different ways. At the G20 summit that was held in Pittsburgh not too long ago, armed police in black uniforms brutally suppressed any peaceful demonstrations, and even blasted large, black sound cannons at innocent by-standers and Pittsburgh residents.

Peaceful activists are face-to-face with a scene straight from a science-fiction film – rank-and-file, armed police in black uniforms with sound cannons and tear-gas

The police fired pepper spray and rubber bullets into the crowds, and physically beat protestors.


In France, the French Government attempted, in 2008, to secretly create a massive database that would track and catalogue details of anyone that has been ‘active in politics or the trade unions, or who has a significant role in business, the media, entertainment or social or religious institutions’. Basically, anyone of any significance to the government.
The information that would be collected on such people would include: information on civil status and occupation, physical addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, physical characteristics, photographs and behaviour, and identity papers. The gathering of such information suggests that it is intended to link straight to the French biometric passports system.
The database, dubbed ‘Sarkozy’s Big Sister’ by its opponents, was forced to be made public due to actions from the National Commission on Information Technology and Freedom in early July of 2008, and as result mass opposition was mounted against it’s imposition. The mass opposition fortunately led to the databases postponement.

In Japan, Railway workers are forced to have daily ‘smile-scans’ to make sure they are constantly smiling in a convincing manner. No, you didn’t read that wrong. More than 500 staff at Keihin Electric Express Railway are made to scan their smile on a machine, in order to make sure the employees are constantly smiling a large, convincing grin.
Japan also installed a biometric ‘security’ system in over 30 airports in 2007, which scans a person’s fingerprint and cross-checks it against a list of known criminal fingerprints. The invasive system was, once again, installed to ‘prevent terrorism’, etc. However, it was found in January of this year that the system can actually be bypassed by putting tape on your finger to confuse the scanner.

The same basic pattern of draconian control-measures emerges in Australia and many, many other countries as well, especially in Europe.

In fact, it makes you wonder what kind of a world we are going into. Are we really going into a world where corporations and bureaucrats can do as they will, without any care for the freedoms of the general population? With big-brother states being implemented across the world, and globalisation (the EU, the UN, etc) bringing all of those authoritarian measures together under a centralised control, are we really descending into a world fascist state?
For people who think such a co-ordinated agenda would be impossible, what about the British and Roman empires? They were monolithic tyrannies that spanned all across the known world, all co-ordinated and orchestrated by a handful of powerful elites. With our modern scientific and technological advancements, nowadays the possibilities are endless.

The Global Elite of this planet, the real ‘Powers-That-Be’ are the Multinational Corporations, the International Bankers, the top-level Secret Society initiates, who you will not often see on television, if at all. People like Gordon Brown, Barack Obama and George Bush are definitely not as powerful as such people. They have major influence on governments and politicians, and the same people that are CEOs and Presidents of huge corporations also go on to become involved in government and the banks and the secret societies. In fact, all those different organisations become ONE organisation, with many different branches. The ‘revolving door’ between the banks and the governments, the corporations and the governments, etc, are really just personnel moving between the different ‘arms’, or ‘members’ or ‘branches’, of the same organisation: The Global Elite.
This ‘Global Elite’ is currently having its way with the world – centralising power into fewer and fewer people through Superstates like the EU, and the UN, etc, that then dictate policy to the nations beneath them, and is implementing big-brother control mechanisms all across the world, that then allow the banks and the corporations to have their way with the world. They are creating a planet of the Corporations, by the Corporations, and for the Corporations, with human beings being little more than a resource to be exploited as ‘business’ demands.
Well, I say ‘Corporations’, but really I mean ‘Mega-Corporations’, since they’re so phenomenally massive. The list of Mega-Corporations, that have no real regard for human values or human life, and are part of this whole Global Elite, could fill pages and pages and pages. Most of the presidents and CEOs are most likely oblivious to the true scale of the world they are creating, but there are a handful of them that know exactly what they are doing and why.

Some of these Corporations that are pursuing this dehumanized corporate agenda (knowingly or unknowingly) are, amongst others, McDonalds (and other fast-food Corporations), Coca-Cola, IBM, DynCorp, Monsanto, Google, AOL, News Corp, Disney, Walmart, Nike, General Electric, Microsoft, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, the list goes on and on and on.

A Corporation is basically a legal entity that is considered a single entity, despite consisting of many persons. But how exactly do these ‘entities’, or ‘persons’ (Mega-Corporations) behave? Given what I am about to explain, and the world they are creating, I would say that their behaviour is primarily ‘Sociopathic’ (basically psychopathic: engages in aggressive, violent, antisocial behaviour with a serious lack of remorse or empathy for their fellow ‘human beings’ or ‘entities’)

MacDonalds have been notorious for being mercilessly cruel to the animals they raise and kill for their food products.
In early 2009, PETA renewed its campaign against animal cruelty at McDonald’s, citing the way that the chickens were killed in the slaughterhouses, and that such methods could be substituted for more ‘humane’ ones. They said:

‘All of McDonald's U.S. chicken suppliers use a system called "electrical immobilization" to kill birds, which involves dumping birds out of transport crates and hanging them upside-down in metal shackles—often resulting in broken bones, extreme bruising, and haemorrhaging. The birds then have their throats cut while they are still conscious and are often immersed in tanks of scalding-hot water while they are still alive and able to feel pain.’

according to the Chicago Tribune, ‘In most U.S. chicken slaughterhouses, birds are plucked from bins by workers and hung upside down on an assembly lines. Their heads are dragged through brine and a shock is administered, which if done properly knocks the bird senseless. A whirring blade then cuts its throat.’

PETA said that such methods could be substituted for what they said was a ‘more humane’ gas-execution method.
Such treatment of animals is well and truly disturbing. I mean, is it really worth putting the creatures through that just to have a few tasty nuggets?
But it makes the food so cheap! It’s more profitable! Never mind if the poor creatures are having hellish executions just so we can have some cheaper nuggets…
They have also attracted a lot of criticism for their products being so unhealthy. And what do you expect, when you consider some of the things people find in their food? A friend of mine once told me of an experience he had at a MacDonald’s restaurant – he said his friend, who was sat just across from him, bit into a chicken nugget, and found it was full of puss! The person later got ill, he told me, as you would expect. There are many examples of anecdotal evidence of unhealthy ‘food’ being eaten at MacDonald’s, I’m sure you can probably think of a few.

MacDonald’s angered vegetarians in 2001 after selling non-vegetarian French-Fries. That may sound baffling to you (‘non-vegetarian French-fries?’ you ask?), but it turned out that the fries had flavourings in them that actually contained beef-extract.

Mackey-Dee’s have also been caught using controversial advertising methods to young children, for example, sponsoring school report cards and giving children who had good grades a free happy meal. In short, exploiting kids who are not really aware of corporate advertising methods.

Other fast-food corporations are equally known for animal cruelty, for example, KFC, as this video explains.

A video explaining how KFC use cruel slaughtering methods. Pamela Anderson may be a tool, but this video has some good points.

The website, set up by non-profit organization PETA, (whom I do not necessarily support, by the way), makes some good points about how KFC abuse animals.

The website states:

• The roughly 1 billion chickens killed each year for KFC's buckets are crammed by the tens of thousands into excrement-filled sheds that stink of ammonia fumes.
• The birds’ legs and wings often break because they’re bred to be too top-heavy and because workers carelessly shove them into transport crates and shackles.
• Chickens’ throats are slit and the animals are dropped into tanks of scalding-hot water to remove their feathers, often while they are still conscious and able to feel pain.

Like I said, I do not necessarily support PETA, but the notion of such measures being employed by KFC slaughterhouses is completely abhorrent.

KFC is a subsidiary of the Yum! Brands, Inc. Corporation, as is Pizza Hut, amongst other fast-food outlets and ‘restaurants’. Yum! is the world’s largest restaurant company, and the Chairman and CEO David C Novak is also a director of J.P Morgan Chase. Remember what I said? The banks and the corporations become different parts of the same thing…

The Coca-Cola Corporation has been aggressively marketing and selling very dangerous soft drinks that are seriously detrimental to people’s health and well-being. Drinking more than two quarts of Cola per day may very well induce severe and possibly even fatal potassium deficiency, the symptoms of which include cramping, paralysis, irregular heartbeat, and even death.
‘Evidence is increasing to suggest that excessive cola consumption can also lead to hypokalemia, in which the blood potassium levels fall, causing an adverse effect on vital muscle functions.’ Said researcher Moses Elisaf, who co-conducted a study published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice.

In 2007 a team of scientists at the National Institute of Health conducted a study that found that drinking two or more Colas per day (diet or normal) was linked to a twofold risk in developing chronic kidney disease.

And if that’s not enough to convince you that Cola is actually seriously bad for you, do you know what happens when you drink a single Cola (or any soft drink containing massive amounts of sugar, caffeine, etc)?

In The First 10 minutes: 10 teaspoons of sugar hit your system. (100% of your recommended daily intake.) You don’t immediately vomit from the overwhelming sweetness because phosphoric acid cuts the flavor allowing you to keep it down.
20 minutes: Your blood sugar spikes, causing an insulin burst. Your liver responds to this by turning any sugar it can get its hands on into fat. (There’s plenty of that at this particular moment)
40 minutes: Caffeine absorption is complete. Your pupils dilate, your blood pressure rises, as a response your livers dumps more sugar into your bloodstream. The adenosine receptors in your brain are now blocked preventing drowsiness.
45 minutes: Your body ups your dopamine production stimulating the pleasure centers of your brain. This is physically the same way heroin works, by the way.
60 minutes: The phosphoric acid binds calcium, magnesium and zinc in your lower intestine, providing a further boost in metabolism. This is compounded by high doses of sugar and artificial sweeteners also increasing the urinary excretion of calcium.
60 Minutes: The caffeine’s diuretic properties come into play. (It makes you have to pee.) It is now assured that you’ll evacuate the bonded calcium, magnesium and zinc that was headed to your bones as well as sodium, electrolyte and water.
60 minutes: As the rave inside of you dies down you’ll start to have a sugar crash. You may become irritable and/or sluggish. You’ve also now, literally, pissed away all the water that was in the Coke. But not before infusing it with valuable nutrients your body could have used for things like even having the ability to hydrate your system or build strong bones and teeth.
There is more that I could say but I think that will suffice…

International Business Machines Corporation, or IBM, under the direction of CEO Thomas J Watson, helped and assisted the Nazis and the Third Reich in The Holocaust. Yep, that’s right. They provided the biometrics technologies for the Nazis to track down and exterminate thousands of Jews across Europe.
Author Edwin Black documents in his ground-breaking book, ‘IBM and The Holocaust’ how they saw a business opportunity and ran with it – even if it involved assisting the very Nazis the Allies were fighting against!

IBM meeting Adolf Hitler

Creepily enough, IBM have been contracted to supply biometrics technologies for the draconian UK Biometric Identity Card system (and connected database), but I’ll come to that again later.

DynCorp International is a Private Military Contractor, or ‘Private Military Corporation’, and aircraft Maintenance Company, employees of which were found out to be involved in sex-slave-trafficking of minors.
Whistle-blower Ben Johnston described the corruption within DynCorp: ‘my main problem,’ he explained ‘was [sexual misbehavior] with the kids, but I wasn't too happy with them ripping off the government, either. DynCorp is just as immoral and elite as possible, and any rule they can break they do.’
Kevin Glasheen, Johnston's attorney, said: ‘This is more than one twisted mind. There was a real corporate culture with a deep commitment to a cover-up.’

As one article on the affair explains:

‘Johnston is not the only DynCorp employee to blow the whistle and sue the billion-dollar government contractor. Kathryn Bolkovac, a U.N. International Police Force monitor hired by the U.S. company on another U.N.-related contract, has filed a lawsuit in Great Britain against DynCorp for wrongful termination. DynCorp had a $15 million contract to hire and train police officers for duty in Bosnia at the time she reported such officers were paying for prostitutes and participating in sex-trafficking. Many of these were forced to resign under suspicion of illegal activity, but none have been prosecuted, as they also enjoy immunity from prosecution in Bosnia.’

‘DynCorp has admitted it fired five employees for similar illegal activities prior to Johnston's charges.’

The multinational Biotech Corporation, The Monsanto Company (the producers of Agent Orange used in the Vietnam War, that led to 400,000 Vietnamese deaths and disabilities, and 500,000 children born with birth defects) routinely dumped large amounts of toxic pollutant PCBs into streams in Anniston, Alabama.
The dumping of PCBs into a west Anniston creek and landfills resulted in the poisoning of much local wildlife and much of the local population. In 1966, Monsanto managers discovered that fish submerged in the poisoned creek turned belly-up within 10 seconds, spurting blood and shedding skin as if dunked into boiling water, but told no one.
Then, in 1969, they found fish in another creek with 7,500 times the legal PCB levels. They decided ‘there is little object in going to expensive extremes in limiting discharges.’ In 1975, a company study found that PCBs caused tumors in rats. They ordered its conclusion changed from ‘slightly tumorigenic’ to ‘does not appear to be carcinogenic.’
As a result of this, much of the local area was poisoned, and a local man, David Baker (President of the Community Against Pollution), who was interviewed about the local poisoning, said:

‘[my brother] died from a…tumour of the brain, cancer of the lungs…he was 16. In the last 3 years, I have lost more friends, they died from illnesses, cancer, sugar-diabetes, hepatitis, all these different illnesses, that come from PCBs and had been related to PCBs.’

Similar issues emerge when we get into the genetically modified food from Monsanto. As the Washington Post article says:
‘[the company’s critics] warn that Monsanto, which no longer produces chemicals, is now promising the world that its genetically engineered crops are safe for human consumption.
"For years, these guys said PCBs were safe, too," said Mike Casey of the Environmental Working Group, which has been compiling chemical industry documents on the Web. "But there's obviously a corporate culture of deceiving the public."’
The Working Group on Biosafety, which makes recommendations on the use of genetically-modified food produced by Monsanto has, or has had, members that include: Linda J. Fisher, vice-president of government and public affairs for Monsanto; Dr Michael A Friedman, Senior Vice-President for Clinical Affairs at G.D. Searle and Co., a pharmaceutical division of Monsanto; Marcia Hale, Director of International Government Affairs for Monsanto, formerly assistant to the President of the United States; Michael Kantor, director of Monsanto former Secretary of the US Department of Commerce; Josh King, director of global communication in the Washington DC office of Monsanto; William D. Ruckelshaus, director of Monsanto, former chief administrator of the United States EPA; Jack Watson, staff lawyer with Monsanto in Washington, former chief of staff to the President of the USA Jimmy Carter, etc, etc, ad infinitum.

You get the idea of the ‘revolving-door’ I spoke about earlier?

In his documentary film, ‘The New Rulers of the World’, award-winning journalist John Pilger exposes how brand-clothing companies, such as Nike, Inc. (named after the Greek goddess of victory) and GAP, exploit impoverished labour camps in Indonesia to make extremely cheap goods, and then sell those goods for extortionate prices in the affluent western world.
John Pilger and his team investigated an impoverished labour camp that makes brand-name-clothing in Indonesia, and how the people that work there are paid, on average, a dismal 72 pence per day. Many of the children in the labour camp are undernourished, he says, because they don’t have the money to buy enough food.

The workers in the sweatshops work insanely long hours, and one worker who was interviewed said that she was not even given a choice about working a 24-hour shift. The workers are bullied mercilessly to produce the goods on time, many workers working 12-hour shifts. And you thought your job was bad?

The multinational Mega-Corporation Wal-Mart is no stranger to using such methods to acquire goods, either. They too have ruthlessly exploited impoverished Chinese and Bangladeshi workers.

The film by award-winning film director/producer Robert Greenwald, Wal-mart: the high cost of low prices, documents how Wal-Mart exploit Chinese and Bangladeshi impoverished workers, how it takes over communities, how Wal-Mart stores have abused the local environment, ruthlessly abuse their own employees in the U.S, and how they have covered up data on crime prevention techniques – refusing to implement measures that would reduce violent crime in Wal-Mart parking lots.

Former President and CEO H Lee Scott was widely criticised during his presidency for the appalling behaviour of the Corporation. Also, let me just mention (to help you get an idea of the ‘revolving-door’ I keep talking about) that Hillary Clinton, wife of Bill Clinton, served on the board of Wal-Mart in 1992, and the board she sat on was, of course, exploiting sweat shop labour, discriminating against women and destroying communities.

The ASDA supermarket chain is itself a subsidiary of Wal-Mart, and in August of 2009, me and a group of friends stopped by an ASDA store in Blackwood to get some food. We went into the store on a Thursday, (which is apparently notorious for having boy-racers congregating in the car-park), and on our arrival we noticed a large number of policemen all throughout the car park. Then, on the way out of the car park, we were handed a notice that said that they (the police) had taken the registration of the car, and that we were no longer allowed into this particular store!
The measure was billed as being there to ‘stop boy racers’, and we noticed that in the queue on the way out, anyone over the age of 30 was just sent off without a notice!
Such an authoritarian measure makes perfect sense when you realise the nature of the Mega-Corporation that owns ASDA, and their agenda.

In 2007, a Panorama documentary for the BBC revealed that Pharmaceutical Corporation GlaxoSmithKline was sending out anti-depressants that actually INCREASED the risk of suicidal behaviour, and intentionally hid the data showing that from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

This Fox News report from a man with an annoying voice explains the deception.

Anti-depressant litigation attorney Ronald L.M Goldmand said:

‘Very simply put, what they did is they took the data that would have shown that the drug can cause suicidal behaviour, and they camouflaged it by moving the numbers around’

GlaxoSmithKline's biggest clinical trial of Paxil on children was held in the US in the 1990s and called Study 329.
Child psychiatrist Dr Neal Ryan, of the University of Pittsburgh, was paid by GSK as a co-author of Study 329. In 2002 he also gave a talk on childhood depression at a medical conference sponsored by GSK, and, as you would expect, he said that Paxil could be a suitable treatment for children and later told BBC reporter Shelley Jofre that it probably lowered rather than raised suicide rates.

However, The Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority began a criminal investigation in 2004 that found that GlaxoSmithKline's own studies showed the drug actually trebles the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour in depressed children.

After 1978, the Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation was found to have actually sold medication for haemophiliacs that actually, literally, contained live AIDS virus. The medication was sold to thousands of people, mostly children, throughout the US, Spain, France and Japan. The most chilling thing is, Bayer knew. When they found out, the product was dropped in the US, but sold elsewhere in Spain, France, and Japan. Because, of course, they ‘needed the profit’.

Thousands of innocent haemophiliacs, and their family members, have died of AIDS as a result.

If I was to list ALL of the documented cases of corporate corruption from these organisations, this blog would be absolutely huge and would take me a VERY long time to write. Since I don’t have that time, and the main point of this blog is yet to come, I thought I’d just give you some background info on them and how they can be so corrupt and sociopathic.

The goal of the Mega-Corporations is basically the super-commercialisation of EVERYTHING, like I said, they are not like you and I, they are sociopathic, and have no remorse for the peoples and beings they exploit.

These Mega-Corporations have lots of Lobbyists that influence governments to do their bidding, particularly in the US.

These corporations also fund and control BOTH the Republicans and Democrats in US elections, as this article documents.

As the author writes:

‘The idea that party affiliation has anything to do with how our government is actually run is laughable, once [you] see (as you read above) that the system itself is set up for wealthy businesses and wealthy business owners to have a disproportionate influence over the happenings in Washington D.C. Have you ever wondered why the wealthiest 5% of our nation controls 95% of everything?’

He describes the seven ways corporations influence Washington:

‘1. Access - Through campaign contributions and other methods, corporations are able to gain access to public officials more often than the average citizen. This means that corporations at least have a better chance of having their case heard.

2. Advisory Committees to Government Agencies - The fact is that the government does not have fact gathering apparati in a number of fields. And so, government agencies appoint committees to provide information and advice. Often, these committees contain many people from the industry involved. The information they provide are used in making public policy. Now, obviously, if the information that government agencies are getting is from the industry involved, then the perspective from which they get the information is likely to be one-sided. For example, if the government needs information on nuclear power, it most likely will call upon nuclear engineers for advice. However, these engineers come from the industry involved. The government does not usually consider the opinion of the private citizen, although the concerns that pregnant women have who live near Three Mile Island or other nuclear power facilities might well need to be taken into account. So the advice the government gets is often stacked in favor of the corporation.

3. The Revolving Door Effect - Many times individuals are employed in an industry, then get called upon to work as the head of an agency or on a regulatory commission, and then return to the industry in question. These people are going to be returning to work in the same industry they may be regulating. How independent can the thinking of these people be? Are they going to make a decision against the interest of that industry if they are eventually going to have to get another job in that industry?

4. Former House and Senate Members Serving as Lobbyists - Many times, when people retire from the House or Senate, they become lobbyists for major corporations. Now, first of all, these people know a great deal about the laws that have been passed relating to their new employer's industry, and they know the inside dealings that went into making these laws. What's more, former representatives and senators maintain the privilege of going on to the floor of their old chambers. That means that during a vote on a bill, they can go on the floor and lobby current senators or representatives as the case may be. No other lobbyists can do this. So these former legislators have a greater ability to influence the process than someone who doesn't have the privilege of the floor, or the other connections they do.

5. Lobbying Itself

6. There is the symbiotic relationship between lobbyists, members of congressional committees and executive agency personnel. In other words, the Washington triangles or iron triangles.

7. Court Action - The fact is that corporations can pay a lot more for legal work than the government. Many times corporate lawyers don not aim at winning a case, but simply at delaying government action. Let's say a corporation has an advertisement on television that the Federal Trade Commission feels is misleading to the general public. The FTC may issue a ruling for the corporation to withdraw that advertisement from the air. The corporation then gets its lawyers to seek a temporary injunction against that ruling until a hearing on the ruling can be held. In the meantime, the advertisement remains on television. Then, the corporation's lawyers use various legal tactics to keep delaying the date of the hearing. There are lots of ways lawyers can do this. Let's say the hearing finally comes up a year later. Before the hearing actually begins, the corporate lawyers announce that they are going to withdraw their objections and that the corporation will follow the FTC's ruling and withdraw the ad. They know they don't have a leg to stand on in court. Has the corporation lost? No. While all this has been going on, the advertisement has been on television for a whole extra year. So even though the corporation is eventually going to lose the case, it winds up winning by delaying things.’

The effect is that, whoever, you vote for, the same corporate agenda is carried out, and we descend into a corporate draconian nightmare ever-faster.

These sociopathic Mega-Corporations then aggressively, and I mean aggressively, market and advertise their products to the general population, constantly bombarding everyone with a ceaseless barrage of manipulative, and subliminal, messages.

They usually fill their adverts with sexual imagery, so you are attracted unconsciously by the sexual nature of the advert, and then they plug their product at the last second.

…See what I mean…

For example, there was a Diet Coke advert that was doing the rounds on British TV where a group of ladies are stuck in a lift, and then a very attractive man comes in and saves them all. The only connection the entire advert had to Diet Coke (which is extremely, dangerously unhealthy for you) was that the man was holding a Diet Coke. That was it. The whole advert was geared to get women to subconsciously connect Diet Coke with the sexy man, and for men to connect the Diet Coke with BEING attractive to women.

McDonald’s subliminal in a US TV show

Even Disney films use sexual subliminal messages to attract parents’ attention. In the example below, a parent would see the image and be subconsciously attracted to it, without really realising why. However, when you realise it, the subliminal loses its power and you become ‘immune’ to it.

A phallic image is, very obviously, hidden in the castle in the background on the front of ‘The Little Mermaid’

In fact, in the Disney film ‘The Rescuers’, a subliminal image of a topless model flashes up for two frames, but when it became public, the image was edited out by Disney. The effect is, once again, to get people to unconsciously associate deep, sexual instincts with their product.

Once you realise that we are being bombarded by corporate advertising 24/7, it starts to lose its effect. Instead of being caught in the spell of feeling that you just HAVE to have the new Lynx fragrance, the new Dodge car, you just cannot RESIST the lure of Diet Coke; you break free and start to get a mind of your OWN.

Now, having gotten thus far, you are probably thinking ‘why the hell haven’t I seen this on the news then?’, because, of course, all too many people are expecting to be spoon-fed exactly what is happening in the world. And the answer is pretty simple – these Mega-Corporations OWN most of the media!

The Multinational Corporation General Electric owns the following media outlets:
• Bravo
• Focus Features & Rogue Pictures
• Global Networks
• Mun2
• NBC Entertainment
• NBC News
• NBC Sports & Olympics
• NBC Universal Television Group
• NBC Universal Television Stations
• Telemundo
• USA Network
• Universal Parks & Resorts
• Universal Pictures
• Universal Studios Home Entertainment
• Weather Plus
• iVillage

The Disney Corporation own:
• Walt Disney Pictures
• Walt Disney Animation Studios
• Pixar Animation Studios
• Disneynature
• Touchstone Pictures
• Hollywood Pictures
• Miramax Films

While the Disney/ABC group owns:
• ABC News
• ABC Family
• Disney Channel
• Disney Family Movies
• Playhouse Disney
• Toon Disney
• Jetix
• Radio Disney

And Disney also own:
• Walt Disney Records
• Hollywood Records,
• Lyric Street Records
• Mammoth Records,
• And Walt Disney Theatrical

The News Mega-Corporation News Corp. owns basically everything, as displayed by this list.

But to list a few of their media outlets, for your reading pleasure, they own:
• The Sun
• News of the World
• The Times
• Sunday Times
• thelondonpaper (a free newspaper which closed in September 2009)
• The Daily Telegraph (Sydney)
• The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney)
• The Australian (national)
• The Weekend Australian (national)
• The Advertiser (Adelaide)
• Sunday Mail (Adelaide)
• The Sunday Times (Perth)
• Herald Sun (Melbourne)
• Sunday Herald Sun (Melbourne)
• mX (Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane)
• The Courier-Mail (Brisbane)
• The Cairns Post (Cairns, Queensland)
• Geelong Advertiser
• Gold Coast Bulletin
• The Mercury and Sunday Tasmanian (Hobart)
• Northern Territory News (Darwin)
• The Sunday Territorian (Darwin)
• Australian Associated Press (45%)
• Papua New Guinea Post-Courier
• The Fiji Times
• New York Post
• The Brooklyn Paper
• Courier-Life Publications
• TimesLedger Newspapers
• Bronx Times Reporter Inc.

And on the Internet they own:
• Fox Interactive Media
o GameSpy
o kSolo
o MySpace
o Rotten Tomatoes
o SpringWidgets
o WhatIfSports
• Beliefnet
• News Digital Media
• Slingshot Labs

So you get the idea how they can keep you in the dark about it all so easily. Also worth mentioning is that Reuters and BBC World are owned by these Global Elite.
They can’t control every single journalist, though, which is why information on the agenda comes out in the controlled mainstream media every now and again. However, the idea is to fill the papers with tabloid news and sports news, and to keep you hooked on headlines about Jordan and Peter Andre, and Jade Goody, etc, etc, ad nauseum, so you are ignorant to what is really going on in the world around you.

Now, the next branch of the Global Elite: the bankers…
A study of 116 of the world’s most successful companies, presented to the Global Forum on Public Governance in May of this year, revealed that the UK has the most obvious ‘old boy’s network’ between the banks, financial institutions, the bodies charged with regulating the banking industry, and the government than Europe or the US. It stated that such ‘revolving-door’ connections ‘lead to a conflict of interest at best and a suspension of critical faculties at worst’.
Barclays was the most connected British-based company with 14 revolving door connections.
The organisations with more than five revolving door connections were Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS/Lloyds Group, Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Dexia Group, HSBC Holdings, JP Morgan Chase and Co, Standard Chartered Bank and UBS.

As this article on the study says:

‘The organisations with more than five revolving door connections were Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS/Lloyds Group, Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Dexia Group, HSBC Holdings, JP Morgan Chase and Co, Standard Chartered Bank and UBS.’
"The Government and the political classes have very close links to the banking industry," said the report's author David Miller, a Professor of Sociology at Strathclyde University, who specialises in researching lobbying.
"I believe this could be one of the factors behind the disaster that has befallen the financial markets. There has not been enough regulation of these connections.”’

And now here’s the real killer. You know when you put money into the bank, or withdraw money, or check your bank account to see how much is there? ALL of that is a complete illusion. There is no physical money involved whatsoever. All banks do is type figures onto a screen, and, viola, you have more money in your account. That’s all it is – figures on a computer screen. But the banks can actually loan that money out and get interest from it, even though it has no physical existence.

All it would take to abolish mass poverty and homelessness throughout the UK would be to get the banks to type figures into people’s bank accounts, and viola, all those poor people would be rich. So why don’t they do that? Well, it upsets the system. The system that keeps all us constantly struggling to survive, while the bankers get richer and richer.
Seriously, ask someone who vehemently defends the banking system and a variation of that is what they will say. They’d probably say something like ‘we can’t play around with the system, it’s all put there to keep our economy flowing’ or ‘structured’ or something.

The same networks emerge in the US, as you would expect.

Timothy Geithner, former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, was appointed by President Obama as United States Chairman of the Treasury. Paul Volcker, former Chairman of the Federal Reserve under Presidents Carter and Reagan, was appointed by Obama as chairman of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, and it goes on and on.

At around 7.40 Greenspan explains that the Federal Reserve answers to no-one, not even the federal government

In the above video, Alan Greenspan, 13th Chairman of the Federal Reserve, explains that the Central Bank of United States, the Federal Reserve, is above government. In his own words: ‘The federal reserve is an independent agency’. And that’s the way it works. The Federal Reserve prints the money off for the government, and the government then has to pay that money back, plus interest. But where does the government get the money to pay the interest? From the tax payer, of course. So it’s an endless cycle of debt and, basically, economic slavery, for the public, while the bankers simply sit back and get paid for printing the money for the federal government.

Greenspan and Bernanke – The Money Masters

Congressman and former Presidential candidate Ron Paul criticizes the Fed

Some of the most prominent and influential banking dynasties include the Warburg family, the Rockefeller family (notable members include: David Rockefeller, Nelson Rockefeller, Jay Rockefeller, and John D Rockefeller), and, most notably, the Rothschild banking dynasty.

As this article explains, the Rothschilds have enjoyed large influence over British politics for a VERY long time:

‘The Rothschild family and politics have been intertwined for generations, ever since Nathan Rothschild, who founded the English branch of the family business, financed Britain's war against Napoleon two centuries ago. Nathan was the son of Mayer Rothschild, who founded the family business in the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt during the 18th century.’

As the article describes, Nathan Rothschild financed British forces, led by Lord Wellington, against Napoleon. However, a Rothschild agent was the first to relay the news of Wellington’s victory over Napoleon specifically to Rothschild. Rothschild then put out the rumour to the London Stock Exchange that Napoleon had in fact won, and as a result stocks plummeted. This then allowed Rothschild to buy up much of the British economy. However, when it later came out that the British had indeed won, the stocks soared up again, and Rothschild therefore dominated the soaring British economy. The Rothschilds have enjoyed incredible influence and power ever since.

The Global Elite use Secret Societies to further network and carry out their agenda – they provide a good veil of secrecy. I mean, they’re not called ‘Secret Societies’ for nothing. The most notable Secret Societies the Elite use are: Freemasonry, The Order of Skull and Bones, the Bohemian Club, and the Illuminati. There are other secret societies, such as the O.T.O and the Knights of Malta, but I’ll be focusing on the others for now.

Freemasonry is, and has been, a very influential fraternal order. Significant freemasons in history have included: Winston Churchill, Benjamin Franklin, Henry Ford (founder of Ford Motor Company), Oscar Wilde, US President Harry S Truman, Albert Pike, Ludwig Van Beethoven, convicted criminal and murderer Kenneth Noye, and first Prime Minister of Canada John A. Macdonald, to name just a few.
Nowadays, the Masons aren’t quite as influential as they used to be; their membership has been declining in more recent years.

Also important to note is that most Freemasons never proceed beyond the 3rd ‘degree’ in the hierarchy of Freemasonry. Legendary Freemason Albert Pike stated in his book, Morals and Dogma, that the first 3 degrees are known as the ‘Blue Degrees’, and that masons of the 3rd degree and below are intentionally misled and kept in the dark about the true nature of the signs and symbols and inner-workings of the elite of Freemasonry.
Because, of course, most masons aren’t among the truly powerful Global Elite. They just go down the Lodge to see their fellow ‘Blue Degree’ initiates, etc. it’s only the higher-level initiates and the really powerful freemasons that network and use freemasonry to carry out their own personal agenda. In short, the Elite of freemasonry use the Secret Society to carry out their agenda.

A lot of UK citizens are completely oblivious to the fact that many Judges are actually freemasons. In Scotland, many judges are members of a Masonic Society and may have even used their connections to influence trials.
In Wales, an esteemed Barrister had his application to become a judge alarmingly turned down, and suspected it was because he was not a mason.

The barrister, a Mr Everest from Pontyclun near Cardiff, said:
‘The judiciary in South Wales is a closed shop which I believe excludes ethnic minorities, women and men who are not part of a Masonic network.
‘After over 30 years as a practising barrister on the Wales and Chester circuit with hundreds of satisfied clients - not one of whom has ever made a complaint against me - I am furious never to have been offered the opportunity to sit as a judge.
‘Through The Western Mail I call on the Labour Government to appoint an eminent and impartial privy councillor to investigate the many miscarriages of justice in South Wales - especially the wrongful convictions that followed the murders of Lynette White and Mr and Mrs Tooze - and to publish a register naming judges who have ever been masons. Judges should be appointed on their merit as lawyers, independent of their standing among masons.’

The Masonic emblem displayed on the front of the Cardiff courts. The statue from the roof of the Old Bailey is imprisoned by ‘Geometry’, one of the things the ‘G’ in the Masonic Square and Compass stands for. She is also standing above 5 all-seeing-eyes, a symbol I will come to shortly…

Author of the book Inside the Brotherhood, Martin Short, estimates that 1 in 6 British police officers are masons, and that there are 600,000 freemasons in the UK today.


In the book, Martin Short documents many cases of corruption within the British Masonic establishment.

A photo of a portrait of Walt Disney in a Masonic Hall in Boston, taken by researcher David Icke

The Illuminati are a Secret Society that exist mostly at the top levels of Freemasonry and another society known as the O.T.O (Ordo Templi Orientis). Remember, once again, about how the different societies and corporations are all the same? They all interconnect through the ‘revolving-door’ I keep on about. ‘Illuminati’ itself is Latin for ‘the enlightened ones’ – enlightened with knowledge the rest of us don’t have.

As occult researcher Jordan Maxwell points out their main symbol is an Egyptian pyramid with ‘an all-seeing-eye’ in the capstone, the very symbol found on the back of the seal of the United States. Really, it doesn’t make any sense to have an Egyptian pyramid on the seal of the US, because Egyptian pyramids are obviously found in Egypt. So why is it there? Because it’s an emblem of a Secret Society that have been deeply involved in American affairs for a very long time.

The Symbol of the Illuminati. The Pyramid is Egyptian, and the Eye in the capstone represents the all-seeing-eye of Horus, the Egyptian Sun Deity. The words at the bottom ‘Novus Ordo Seclorum’ roughly translate as ‘New World Order’

The Pyramid itself is a symbol of the hierarchies the Global Elite use – their banks’ hierarchies, their corporations’ hierarchies, their Secret Societies’ hierarchies. It’s a very efficient way of governing – only the guys at the ‘top’ are really ‘in-the-know’ (enlightened with knowledge), while the guys below are just carrying out orders. If you work for a bank, or an elite corporation, you’re working in the unenlightened bottom section of the pyramid, while the top guys who run the whole bank/corporation are in the illuminated capstone.

The all-seeing-eye of the Egyptian Sun God, Horus

Like I said, The Illuminati exist mostly at the top levels of Freemasonry, which is why the illuminated capstone figures so much in Masonic symbolism.

As you can see, the All-Seeing-Eye is a prominent Masonic symbol – also note the skull-and-crossbones and coffin at the bottom…

Just as you would expect a Christian group would use Christian imagery, or a Jewish group would use Judaic imagery, so ‘Illuminists’, as they are known, use Illuminati imagery. As you can see in the examples below, they have indeed put Illuminati symbols into their logos, knowing that most people are ‘unenlightened’ and don’t know what the symbolism means.

Some Illuminati symbols in logos. America Online, or ‘AOL’, merged with Time Warner in 2001. Also notice that the Airwalk Symbol is an illuminated capstone with a pupil at the bottom…

It’s pretty obvious who owns MI5/MI6

Now, the American Bohemian Club…

As I wrote in a previous blog:

‘Bohemian Grove is a 2,700-acre campground inside a redwood forest 70 miles north of San Francisco. It is a secretive retreat for the all-male Bohemian Club, a club which consists of some of the most powerful men in the world. The Club has included members of very wealthy families, such as members of the Bush and Rockefeller families, and the Club has an annual encampment and engage in bizarre rituals at the Grove.’

Attendees have included: Governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger, Al Gore, Lyndon B Johnson, Ray Kroc (the guy behind MacDonald’s fast-food empire), David Rockefeller, George Bush junior and senior, and Henry Kissinger.

The Symbol of the Bohemian Club – the Owl

‘In 2000 investigative reporter Alex Jones successfully infiltrated the Grove, and managed to film the ‘Cremation of Care’ ritual, when what is believed to be an effigy is burnt in sacrifice to a 40-foot stone owl [actually, I’ve found its closer to 20-foot] called ‘Moloch’. Jones published the shocking footage in his documentary ‘Dark Secrets Inside Bohemian Grove’. Alex Jones points out that the programme for the ceremony clearly has the silhouette of a child’s skeleton edited into the flames, as if the child had been burnt alive.’

An actual photo of the Cremation of Care ritual

The Frost Bank building in Texas is very obviously modelled after the Bohemian Grove owl

The Order of Skull and Bones, at Yale University, has as its members some of the most powerful people in America, for example, past members have included President Howard Taft, W Averell Harriman, George Bush junior and senior, David Rockefeller, and former presidential candidate John Kerry (who was running against ‘Bonesman’ George Bush!).
The society’s headquarters is a place called the ‘Tomb’, an ominous looking building at Yale campus where the ‘Bonesmen’ (the members of Skull and Bones) meet. Their symbol is a skull-and-crossbones, with their ‘magic number’ 322 emblazoned beneath.
Their ‘Tomb’ is full of death imagery and skull-and-crossbones’, and new initiates into the order have to undertake macabre and somewhat disturbing ritualistic initiations.
In 2001 New York Observer investigative journalist Ron Rosenbaum and a crew of cameramen managed to secretly videotape one of their bizarre ritualistic initiations. Parts of the videotape ended up on national news, and revealed some very strange and macabre behaviour.

The Skull and Bones emblem

These corporations, banks, and politicians inter-connect through ‘think-tanks’ that then pursue the globalist agenda. These ‘think-tanks’ are, amongst others: the Council on Foreign Relations, its ‘sister-group’ The Royal Institute on International Affairs (or Chatham House, as it is also known), The Club of Rome, The Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group.

The Bilderberg group is an extremely secretive group that meet up for annual conferences, in a different place and part of the world each year (usually around Europe). It consists of around a hundred or so of the most powerful people in the world: major corporate CEOs and presidents; heads of media, banking and finance; royalty; leading politicians, etc, and has been in existence for about 50 years now.

The Bilderberg conferences are attended by a regular ‘inner-core’ of members (with members such as arch-manipulators David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger, Downing Street manipulator Peter Mandelson, Franco Barnabe of Rothschild Europe, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Spanish royalty, Etienne Davignon, etc), while ‘outer-members’ get less-frequent invites (who include major heads of media, top professors at leading universities, journalists, heads of military, etc). Notable attendees include: George Osborne, Timothy Geithner, Paul Volcker, Robert Zoellick, Richard N Haas (president of the Council on Foreign Relations), many journalists from The Economist, Richard Dearlove, Zbigniew Brzezinski etc, etc.

One reason you’ve probably never heard of such a group before is that the media is mostly owned by Bilderberg – so it never gets in the papers. Well, it does sometimes, but not usually. The only notable exception I can think of is Charlie Skelton reporting on the Bilderberg conference last year for the Guardian newspaper.

A rare headline on a recent Bilderberg Conference

Tony Blair went to Bilderberg in 1993 (just before becoming Prime Minister); Gordon Brown attended Bilderberg in 1991.

Veteran, renegade journalist Jim Tucker, who has been tirelessly researching and reporting on Bilderberg for over 30 years, says that ‘Bilderberg’s plan for the whole world is nothing less than World Government’. And that would seem to be exactly the case.

In an article published in the Financial Times of London, called ‘and now for a world government’, columnist Gideon Rachman makes a case for a controlling world government. And, lo and Behold, it turns out the Financial Times is edited by Bilderberg attendee, Martin Wolf.

Towards the end of the column, Rachman sneers: ‘International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic’. I see. This article probably wouldn’t even be written in a country with a good sense of liberty and personal freedom, since it flies in the face of everything ‘individual liberty’, or ‘individual independence’, means. But sadly such senses are lacking in this country, and across the world, aren’t they?

In his book, best-selling author and Bilderberg researcher Daniel Estulin describes the way Bilderberg attendees implement the group’s agenda:

‘According to founder Prince Bernhard of Holland, as quoted in Alden Hatch’s authorized biography of the Prince, each Bilderberg attendee is “magically stripped of his office” upon entering the meeting, becoming “a simple citizen of his country for the duration of the conference.”…”when these representatives of the Western establishment leave a Bilderberg meeting,” he said “they carry the group’s consensus with them. The high-powered Bilderberg debates are intended to build unity by resolving differences, and therefore certainly have a significant influence on attendees”
‘Indeed, from the moment the Bilderberg Conference closes, what seems to happen – “almost by accident” – is that the consensus reached in different areas of discussion at the Bilderberg annual meeting are wholeheartedly promoted by these all-powerful political and commercial interests through the mainstream press, while simultaneously becoming common policy to governing international forces of seemingly different persuasions.’

In fact, Bilderberg’s own leaked documents from 1955 show that they planned to create a single European currency, and, as you would expect, later down the line the Euro was created. Globalisation = centralisation, which is what the whole thing is about.

‘Today we are again witnessing the emergence of transnational elites…[whose ties] cut across national boundaries…it is likely that before long the social elites of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist or globalist in spirit and outlook…[national] sovereignty [independence] is no longer compatible with reality.’ – Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages

‘Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterising my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global, political, and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and am proud of it.’ – David Rockefeller, Memoirs

This agenda the Global Elite have – a centralised, Big-Brother world government – they call ‘The New World Order’. This ‘New World Order’ is intended to be a corporate and bureaucratic heaven: every activity of the citizenry tracked and traced efficiently, all governments answering to a highly efficient and scientific world authority – a world where conformance is enforced and there is no room whatsoever for personal or individual liberty or freedom. A perfectly regimented World State, which all citizens and peoples answer to.

'The New World Order' is a phrase first used by Samuel Z Batten in his book of the same name to describe a 'World Federation….with a world parliament, an international court, and an international police force’

The term has also been used publicly by H G Wells, George H W Bush, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Dan Quayle, David Rockefeller, Gary Hart and Arthur Schlesinger Jr. of the CFR, and many more. H G Wells actually wrote a book called ‘The New World Order’ in which he described a scientific, socialist world government ruling over the peoples of the world.
In short, a New World Order is a centralised world fascist state, with a Big Brother world government, residing over international Superstates such as the European Union, and the North American Union, etc.

This agenda is being manifest in our daily lives by the introduction of the Big Brother State throughout the world, and the erosion of national sovereignty in favour of centralized Superstates and globalisation.

‘Whatever the price of the [Communist] Chinese revolution, It has obviously succeeded, not only in producing more dedicated and efficient administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose…The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.’ – David Rockefeller, New York Times, August 10th, 1973

Remember the description of the MacDonald’s slaughterhouses? Well, basically, that is what they want to create for the human race: a global corporate factory of merciless profit-generation, where human beings are degraded and exploited for every last ounce of profit that can be wrung from them.

‘You take the blue pill, the story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in ‘Wonderland’, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.’ – ‘Morpheus’, The Matrix


The choice is now up to you. You can choose to pull the wool back over your eyes and pretend that everything you’ve just read is not true, that I’m a big liar or something, and go back to sleep in your happy little world.
Or, you can choose to wake the hell up, confront this information, and go on a personal journey of discovery and freedom, and help in setting the world free from the chains that are being slung around it by power-mad elites, chains that have been over the earth, to so some extent, for thousands of years.

History is basically one account after another of empires, tyranny, mind-control, and genocide. However, for the first time, the elites actually have the ability to create a scientific dictatorship, whereby they can actually get people to enjoy their own enslavement through propaganda and scientific mind-control techniques.
Also for the first time, we, the free, sovereign human beings of the world, actually have the ability to tear down this cycle of enslavement and build a civilisation built on freedom, love, and happiness.

It’s all a case of whether or not you are going to choose to stop co-operating with your own enslavement, to spread the word about the mass of corruption in the world, and stop working for the banks, corporations, etc. or, you could choose to forget about it all and just end up in high-tech enslavement grid in a few years time. The elite generally project that they will achieve World Government within a decade.

The choice is up to you.

for more information, please visit:

No comments:

Post a Comment